I realized the other day, while listening to an episode of This American Life about infidelity, that there are some topics in which I have so little inherent interest that a work focusing on them has to be extraordinarily good, or else largely about something else, to compel my interest.
One of those topics is infidelity. Another is zombies. (Zombies cheating on each other would be my ultimate "bored now.")
Perhaps infidelity doesn't horrify me on the level upon which I need to be horrified. I get the visceral anguish at the idea of being dumped or unloved or supplanted or lied to or infected with an STD, but not the horror solely at the thought of one's lover having sex or an emotional relationship with someone else. When faced with angsty love triangles, I tend to wonder why no one ever raises the possibility of an open relationship or polyamory. And finally, I've never been tempted to cheat myself.
But my lack of caring about infidelity goes beyond an inability to personally relate. I enjoy tons of fiction I don't personally relate to. But infidelity-driven plots nearly always strike me as dull, trivial, unnecessary, irritating, and give me a sense of second-hand embarrassment.
As for zombies, they are gross, rotting, and lack intelligence and personality. The first two actively turn me off, the last one removes the things that interest me in a character. The only zombie stories I've ever enjoyed are ones in which the interest is in the characters fighting or fleeing the zombies, and ones in which the zombies are still intelligent and have personalities. But in those cases, they are barely zombies at all.
I am also suspicious of vampires and faeries, but that's nothing inherent, it's just that they're so often done and so often done unimaginatively. Show me a new or merely extremely well-written take on faeries, vampires, or faepires, and I will happily settle down to read.
Please discuss the subjects and tropes which make you flee in the other direction, whether they're well-executed or not. (Or share my loathing for zombies and cheaters.)
One of those topics is infidelity. Another is zombies. (Zombies cheating on each other would be my ultimate "bored now.")
Perhaps infidelity doesn't horrify me on the level upon which I need to be horrified. I get the visceral anguish at the idea of being dumped or unloved or supplanted or lied to or infected with an STD, but not the horror solely at the thought of one's lover having sex or an emotional relationship with someone else. When faced with angsty love triangles, I tend to wonder why no one ever raises the possibility of an open relationship or polyamory. And finally, I've never been tempted to cheat myself.
But my lack of caring about infidelity goes beyond an inability to personally relate. I enjoy tons of fiction I don't personally relate to. But infidelity-driven plots nearly always strike me as dull, trivial, unnecessary, irritating, and give me a sense of second-hand embarrassment.
As for zombies, they are gross, rotting, and lack intelligence and personality. The first two actively turn me off, the last one removes the things that interest me in a character. The only zombie stories I've ever enjoyed are ones in which the interest is in the characters fighting or fleeing the zombies, and ones in which the zombies are still intelligent and have personalities. But in those cases, they are barely zombies at all.
I am also suspicious of vampires and faeries, but that's nothing inherent, it's just that they're so often done and so often done unimaginatively. Show me a new or merely extremely well-written take on faeries, vampires, or faepires, and I will happily settle down to read.
Please discuss the subjects and tropes which make you flee in the other direction, whether they're well-executed or not. (Or share my loathing for zombies and cheaters.)
Tags:
From:
no subject
I get that you don't like the trope, which is an excellent reason not to read the book; I'm just wondering if you had.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I hate multiple-viewpoint switch-POV-by-chapter books, and have since The Two Towers. Nonetheless, a friend has managed to suck me into Game of Thrones.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I can't stand David Eddings, but he was, at least, straightforward about his narrative preferences. When his protagonists set out to destroy an entire ethnic group, they came right out and said so.
Relatedly, I also hate it when the villain destroys him/herself in some ill-thought-out act of evil, so that the heroes don't have to dirty their hands punishing him/her. This may be a side-effect of my middle-school Anne McCaffrey overdose.
From:
no subject
The thing that repels me in the most boring way in books is when a novel is about a writer. This may be because most of the examples I've read of this have been by privileged, white male writers who are using their privileged, white male writer stand-ins to obsess about the sort of privileged, white male concerns that I find irrelevant or nauseating, such as: What if a woman bites off my penis during fellatio? or: Asian women, what are they like?!
John Irving's The World According to Garp is an example of this sort of book.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Bored of vampires, too -- burnt out on those a couple decades ago, with Tanya Huff's and P.N. Elrod. The only one that has tempted me recently is Peter Watts' Blindsight, but I haven't picked up a copy yet.
Also the infidelity - ho hum. Why don't you try, oh, communicating about needs instead? >.> Yeah.
I have been having a really hard time starting books that are about (stereotypical) straight white males, period. Bouncing off them, really hard lately.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I think I have no *specific* indifference to zombies so much as an indifference to horror genre overall, I think.
Other things that make me run: stereotypical Evil Religion, for obvious reasons (a good serious examination of evil within religious systems, mine own or others, is one thing, but the kneejerk This Is A Religion And Therefore Naturally Oppressive is just lazy and irritating); same for stereotypical Hypocritical Political Activists. So, I guess I don't like people who stereotype me, is what I'm really saying here.
I'm not sure I've ever met a Coming Of Age fiction I really liked, despite the narrative's prevalance and the skill with which it is sometimes done.
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I avoid books billed as grim dark. If I want something with stone falls everyone dies, I will read the news.
From:
no subject
I often find depictions of musicians/composers a hard sell unless they're written by musicians, but this may be Guy Gavriel Kay's fault because he writes about music so badly. Whenever he goes on about the high ineffable achingness of it all, I want to tell him to shut the f*** up and get over himself and tell me about practical things like whittling down reeds or tuning pegs slipping in cold weather.
I don't run away from zombies, but I generally find them either gross or boring. The thing I really don't get is pirates. I find pirates incredibly boring as a category, and I'm not sure why. You'd think that ship-to-ship combat or whatever would interest me, but it just doesn't.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
"Cowboy pride can always get a man through/But cowboy pride will make a fool of you."
The Iliad managed to be about exactly that in an infinitely more interesting way than singing about a guy who sleeps with a waitress when he's on the road. *yawn*
I find the concept of zombies so unappealing that I've never been inclined to watch or read anything with them, ever.
From:
no subject
I have an increasingly low tolerance for preachiness.
From:
no subject
Het love stories. No, adding a random romance is REALLY not necessary, especially when its the arrogant guy being an asshole until the lady gives in. Or the "we're gonna get you married for political purposes and to hell with what you want!" trope.
From:
no subject
I don't handle infidelity-related plots well; either I want to punch the characters because I over-identify with the cheated-on party or I get upset because the painfulness is written about accurately. Neither is my first choice for fun reading.
Tropes I don't like:
Love triangles. Romance as redemption. Angsty loner bad boys. Most zombies. Most faeries. Most vampires. Werewolves who bear no resemblance whatsoever to wolves. I'm growing more and more tired of urban fantasy heroines who hate their supernatural jobs. Why can't just one LOVE saving Seattle from the forces of evil every year or something?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Infidelity doesn't do anything for me, but love triangles do when there's societal pressures making things triangular. I'm watching an awesome Chinese drama which has a strong woman character with much agency caught between two guys, who are friends & both being very reasonable about letting her choose, but this is 18th century China and widow remarriage is impossible for her to consider, so when she picks _that's it forever_. And one of them is terminally ill!
From:
no subject
I also find infidelity inherently uninteresting, but I realized last week at the ballet that there is one method and only one that makes it interesting to me and that is . . . interpretive dance. The plot of Jardin aux Lilas should make it intensely boring to me, but all the sneaky dancing where they're constantly whipping around in the middle of their pas de deux and peering into corners and sneakily holding hands with one person while dancing with another person allows for such cool choreography!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I love faeries... but mainly only my own faeries. Isn't that terrible? But there you go. On occasion I like other people's fairies (e.g. Perilous Gard, Moorchild), but more often I'm irritated by them. And I'm cross, because faeries are so overdone that I'll probably never get a chance to share mine.
From:
no subject
Standard robots/mechs. Gundam, yawn. Robots with inexplicable humanoid manifestations and metaphysical and sexual symbolism, I'm there! (Wtf, Melody of Oblivion.) Robots that manifest on another, unexplained plane of existence that are also full of metaphysical and sexual symbolism, I'm there! (Wtf, Star Driver.) But just a bunch of robots fighting each other for some war or whatever? Meh.
I think from this we learn that I only really like sci-fi tropes when they're not... actually... sci-fi.
I also don't like epics that are all about war and politics. (Another reason I don't like Gundam.) I mean, war and politics are fine in stories that are really character focused (and focused on only a few characters, unlike those ridiculously enormous casts), and more about character interaction and COOL STUFF... Like say, Hundred Thousand Kingdoms or Leviathan. But in general, I effing hate war epics. Yawn x39832479827.
I am also uninterested in very nearly every bit of realistic fiction ever.
From:
no subject
(I have been listening to This American Life reruns while doing chores, and that was one of the handful where I wound up skipping ahead a lot.)
As for genres that bore me breathless: any military-focused story where I am expected to be enthralled by the military action unto itself. I just don't care about armies as armies. I care about individuals. I can be persuaded to care about cultures, and accordingly the outcome of wars. But battles themselves? I rapidly lose track of what's happening, and then I fall asleep. The kind of milSF in which the joy of it is the detailed depiction of futuristic war is therefore not for me.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I also have approximately zero interest in angels/nephilim/fallen celestial beings. There's one rising YA trend I'm happy to not participate in.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
This is a large part of why I find Carey's second Kushiel trilogy so much less interesting than the first. I flat-out don't care that Imriel and Sidonie have the hots for each other but politics means they shouldn't be together but they're so overwhelmed with lust that they sneak around doing it anyway. I don't understand that motivation, and have no interest in reading about it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Zombies. Everything about zombies, except maybe jokes.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I hate everything with angels in it. I don't give a flying cahootie's ass if Your Angels Are Different, they're still angels and I say the hell with them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: