rachelmanija: (Default)
rachelmanija ([personal profile] rachelmanija) wrote2012-07-24 11:15 am

Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders, by Aaron T. Beck, MD

Classic work on cognitive therapy by one of its founders. Parts are technical, but overall it’s straightforward, easy to read, and a good introduction.

The basic idea of cognitive therapy (CT) is that a lot of anxiety is caused by thoughts. Typically, these are negative, irrational, automatic thoughts which go on at a low level of consciousness – not unconsciousness, but a sort of background chatter which you may not be aware of, but can easily call into awareness if you pay attention. Stuff like, “She hates me,” “I’m a loser,” “They won’t hire me,” etc.

These thoughts are what cause or precipitate anxiety, depression, and panic attacks; if you become aware of the thoughts, then you can challenge them and teach yourself to think them less. You will then be less depressed, anxious, and panicky. (Mindfulness-based CT suggests that all CT works not by literally changing your thoughts, but by changing your relationship to your thoughts. I think both are a factor, but I’m with the mindfulness camp that the relationship aspect is more significant.)

That’s the basic theory. I’ll highlight details I thought were especially interesting.



- Trust your client. If you ask them what they were thinking before the anxiety attack, you may have to make them dig a little, but eventually they’ll come up with something. Trust what they give you. They know what they thought. Also ask for visual images and fantasies.

- Look for personal meanings. The public meaning of “hospital” is “place where people go to be cured.” Your hospital-phobic client may have the personal meaning of hospital be “place where people are anesthetized, cut up, and die.”

- This relates to root-cause beliefs. The negative thought might be “They don’t like me.” Asking why it’s important to be liked may eventually elicit something like, “I must be liked by everyone always, or I’m worthless,” or “I should be so wonderful that everyone loves me.” (Shoulds are generally harmful and unrealistic. Listen for them.)

- Depressed/anxious people often think everything relates to them: if someone glances their way, it proves the person hates, scorns, or is laughing at them. They will gain in self-esteem once they consciously consider that they are not the center of the universe. (The single most important insight I got from doing CT, by the way. It sounds obvious but in real life, it’s very easy to forget.) This can be subtle: you hear about someone having a heart attack and think, “That could happen to me.” Sure, it could. But in reality, that’s someone else’s heart, not yours.

- Explain how CT works in advance. You are collaborating with your client; don’t rigidly stick to your own agenda. Check in periodically to make sure you’re on the same page; ask them if they disagree, and make sure they believe that disagreement is fine. Ask them to state areas of agreement and disagreement. Also, don’t set yourself up as Superman who’s going to swoop in and solve all your client’s problems. They need to know that this is a partnership and they have to put in some serious work.

- Cognitive distortions are one thing, but you can’t reason people out of actual delusions. However, you can sometimes get clients to stop acting on delusions by discussing the consequences of their behavior with them. (ie, they may still think their neighbor is the Devil, but be convinced that it would not be in their best interest to break his windows.)

- When clients come in with multiple problems, try to find a common theme, then tackle the theme. Similarly, try to see if there’s a single problem which is causing all the others, then tackle that. (ie, multiple problems caused by root “fear of social interaction.”)

- You don’t need to solve ALL the problems. Once the major crises are resolved and the client has a handle on CT techniques and can use them on their own, they’re good to go. Other stuff will come up, but the important thing is that now they’re equipped to handle it.

- Experimentation: teach clients to figure out what their negative thoughts are (if it’s not obvious) by recording thoughts before and during moments of anxiety/depression. Journaling is good for this. Eventually, patterns will emerge. Once the thoughts have been moved to conscious awareness, you can discuss whether or not they’re valid. Simply learning to observe one’s own thoughts often creates distance, which lessens the emotional impact. (This is the core of the mindfulness-based approach.)

- If they don’t see how thoughts are unrealistic in conversation or if it’s not sinking in emotionally, they can test their thought-hypotheses via real-world experimentation. (Is it really true that going to the party will be the worst experience ever?)

- Discuss the worst that can happen. Some negative thoughts do involve real possibilities. But in depressed people, the worst outcome is assumed to definitely happen, and goes way beyond bad stuff that could realistically happen. You want people to think, “My speech might be awesome, or average. But if it’s terrible, the worst that will happen is I’ll be embarrassed for a few days and that will suck, but it’s unlikely to affect my job and my husband will be very sympathetic,” rather than, “My speech will definitely be terrible, and I’ll get fired, and everyone will scorn me, and I will be humiliated forever.”

- Cognitive-behavioral interventions for depression: schedule activities. Have client rate activities for feelings of pleasure and mastery (accomplishment.) Consider alternative explanations and alternative actions. Cognitive rehearsal (imagine yourself doing stuff successfully.) Homework: experiments, log of automatic thoughts.



Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders

[identity profile] gaudior.livejournal.com 2012-07-25 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh. Actually, I think this: CT first and psychodynamic later is kind of what I do. Only more DBT than straight CT, because lots of people with trauma.

But my general approach seems to be: "Okay, hi, what are the problems you're dealing with? Right, let's explore this. Here are some skills for identifying and preventing panic attacks/alternate activities to cutting/methods of grounding/methods of relaxation/steps you can take to get out of your terrible housing situation/ways you can deal with the paperwork to get yourself on disability/etc!

"Did that work?

"No? Okay, interesting. Let's look deeper at why not. (And also, here are some other things you can try.)"

My feeling is that it'll be most useful to get someone out of their most immediate crisis before we start looking deep. In no small part because in order for the deep digging to work well, they need to know me enough to trust me some. So we'll look at behavioral changes they can make first, but the point of it is immediate stabilization, demonstration of therapy as something that can make them feel better, and establishing rapport between us.

And, I mean, I check in-- if someone's been in therapy for three months and their initial symptoms are gone, I'll ask them if they'd like to stop. But I haven't yet had anyone take me up on it.

[identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com 2012-07-25 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Here are some skills for identifying and preventing panic attacks/alternate activities to cutting/methods of grounding/methods of relaxation/steps you can take to get out of your terrible housing situation/ways you can deal with the paperwork to get yourself on disability/etc!

If anyone had ever done any of that, I would have stuck around.

Until I found the CT therapist, I managed to find a whole series of therapists who started with "Let's talk about your feelings about your childhood/your parents and how they are influencing your feelings now," continued with "let's talk about your feelings (etc) some more," and never gave me anything else.

I actually did end up talking quite a lot about the past and my feelings. But not until I was stabilized. She was the only person who didn't skip the stabilization. And since the popular image of therapy is "talk about your feelings," I didn't realize that there was a problem with the therapists. I assumed that I was a hopeless case.

[identity profile] gaudior.livejournal.com 2012-07-26 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh dear.

I mean... I don't think that what I do falls, strictly speaking, under any of the major psychodynamic theories. I'm not sure what really effective psychodynamic therapists do with people in crisis.

Although it may have to do with something strange: I feel that most people who say "let's talk about your feelings" don't actually do enough of, um, talking about feelings. They talk about events, and people's beliefs about the events, and maybe relationships, and maybe symptoms. But there's not nearly enough of the "oh, hey, this is what anger feels like physically. This is what you can use anger for, and what its function is. What do you do with anger?"