In that case, I will tell you here: I had the same problems with the adaptation that I had with the book, which was that the protagonist never quite came alive to me as a character and I was bored by everything involving Lee Harvey Oswald. I additionally found the love story less compelling in the miniseries than I did in the book - my favorite part of the book was the long stretch where the hero is just hanging out being a teacher and dealing with the fallout from his girlfriend's stalker. What I did like about the miniseries was the look of '60s, the credit sequence (damning with faint praise, but it really was excellent), and the darkly comic aspect of the ways the past tries to prevent itself from being changed.
The changes it made to the story generally made sense, but it missed one of the most fun aspects of time travel, which is the repeated tries at getting things right - he only makes one major trip to the past. It also failed to fix what I thought was the big flaw of the book, which was providing more of a sense of who the hero was as a person and why he was so determined to save Kennedy. James Franco was OK but there wasn't much there there. I think a better or more interesting actor could have sold it way more on the script they had.
VAGUE SPOILERS for 11.22.63
The changes it made to the story generally made sense, but it missed one of the most fun aspects of time travel, which is the repeated tries at getting things right - he only makes one major trip to the past. It also failed to fix what I thought was the big flaw of the book, which was providing more of a sense of who the hero was as a person and why he was so determined to save Kennedy. James Franco was OK but there wasn't much there there. I think a better or more interesting actor could have sold it way more on the script they had.