rachelmanija (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
rachelmanija) wrote2010-09-28 09:50 am
rachelmanija) wrote2010-09-28 09:50 am
Mockingjay, by Suzanne Collins
I didn’t love the first two books in this series – the worldbuilding is flimsy and I couldn’t help comparing them to the remarkably similar Battle Royale movie, which I like a lot more - but I liked Katniss, her narrative voice, and the energy of the story enough to keep reading. That was a mistake.
Not only is Mockingjay awesomely depressing, but the elements I enjoyed in the first two books are absent. It lacks energy, and Katniss’s character has changed radically and off-page before the book begins: the angry, determined survivor of the first two novels is gone, replaced by a clinically depressed and passive girl who spends most of the book in a despairing haze, being moved around like a pawn by authority figures.
This was such a deliberately and consistently grim novel that I ended up sorry that I read it, and I rarely feel that way. The first two books were dark in ways which logically followed from the premise: the story was about kids forced to kill in gladiatorial combat, and kids were killed in gladiatorial combat. This one is dark in ways which logically follow from the premise, but also in ways which don't. Sometimes people act out of character solely so that horrible things can happen, and a climactic scene makes absolutely no sense solely so that the most horrible thing of all can happen.
My usual example separating inherently depressing from gratuitously depressing is a Holocaust novel in which everyone dies in a concentration camp, and a Holocaust novel in which everyone dies in a concentration camp except for the protagonist's true love, who is liberated, runs joyously across the street to meet her, and is squashed by a cement truck. Not only was the cement truck not a logical consequence of genocide, but by adding implausible elements to make genocide even more depressing, the entire novel and so the genocide it contains seem less real, and so defeats the author's purpose.
Mockingjay is a cement truck novel.
It’s not necessary to write a book which is no fun in order to point out that war is bad, nor is it necessary to make the book excruciatingly depressing in order to convey that the heroine is depressed. Aristotle wrote all about the paradox of audiences getting profound enjoyment out of watching horrific tragedies unfold onstage. The emotional state of the protagonist does not have to be inflicted on the audience to make the audience to understand how the protagonist is feeling.
The first spoiler cut only describes the first sixteen pages, which is one of the most stunningly depressing openings I’ve ever read.
The page numbering starts at 3.
Page 3: Katniss stumbles despairingly through the firebombed ash of her district.
Page 5: Drugged, concussed, and depressed, Katniss stares at the mounds of corpses and blames herself.
Page 6: 90% of her district is dead and it's all her fault.
Page 8: District 13, which she’d hoped was the Promised Land or at least okay, turned out to be a fascist hellhole.
Page 9: Peeta is being tortured by Capitol and his entire family is dead. Katniss breathes in the ashes of her friends.
Page 11. Finnick is brain-damaged and/or having a total mental breakdown.
Page 12. It’s revealed that Cinna died off-page. (Cinna was one of my favorite characters and at least deserved an on-page death.)
Page 13. Yay! A moment of happiness! Prim's cat Buttercup survived... by eating the corpses of Katniss's friends.
Page 16: It’s revealed that the girls who helped Katniss in the previous book, Bonnie and Twill, died horribly off-page. This is completely gratuitous - they didn't even have to be mentioned and it would have been completely plausible if they'd escaped, but are brought up just so Katniss can know that they burned to death.
Had I been normally browsing, I would probably have given up there. However, I was determined to stay at air-conditioned Borders to prevent heat exhaustion, so I continued, cool but depressed.
The next spoiler cut is for the rest of the book.
Katniss is depressed, despairing, and unmotivated on page one. There is nowhere to go from there, other than "total mental breakdown." (Or up, if it was the kind of book in which up was a possibility.) When she grimly realizes that Capitol will use Peeta to break her, I thought, "That's unnecessary!"
I was bored by the PTSD in this book. It felt very textbook, especially as everyone had the exact same symptoms. It was like "flashbacks, check; nightmares, check; jumpiness, check; loss of concentration, check; total despair, check." It wasn’t that it was wrong, it’s that neither people nor mental illnesses are cookie-cut-outs.
When Katniss briefly feels like she’s done something good by comforting the wounded, the hospital is promptly bombed and everyone is killed. The one person from 13 whom Katniss likes gets his legs blown off and dies in agony. Her entire team, except for Gale and Peeta, dies horribly.
Finnick, once a source of light relief and interesting complexity in that he seemed to enjoy his status as a sex symbol despite its horrific origins, reveals that actually he was a sex slave and was being raped and forced to pretend to enjoy it. He’s borderline catatonic for much of the book. When he recovers, gets married, and is happy, I immediately thought, “He’s so dead!” Sure enough, he is soon after eaten by lizard-dogs.
Katniss spends most of the book being passive, hospitalized, or manipulated by others. Nothing she does of her own accord in the entire book, up until the moment when she kills Coin, ever succeeds. Even her mission to kill Snow fails. Though apparently it provided a diversion, so the rebels could... kill their own medics, including Katniss’s sister. What?
The final cherry of doom on the sundae of despair is the death of Prim. The completely nonsensical way this came about illustrates how so much of the grimness was shoehorned in for its own sake, not because the story logically led there. If the bombs were dropped by the rebels, why did the rebels let their own medics rush in to be killed? If the bombs were dropped by Capitol, why would they take out their own shield?
The fact that we didn't even see the long-term consequences of Prim’s death made it seem dually wrong: only there to rub in that everything sucks, AND to make the happy ending even more unconvincing!
By the end, Katniss is utterly broken and suicidal, Peeta has been psychologically destroyed, Gale has turned into a monster, and nearly everyone Katniss ever loved or even met is dead. In this context, the happy ending is ludicrous. Also, her "choice" of Peeta is meaningless, as Gale took himself out of the running by becoming a brutal terrorist who directly or indirectly killed her sister, and living alone, in the state she was in, would have quickly resulted in her suicide.
Apart from her personal life, if we are to believe a better government was put in, who put it there? Everyone we know is either dead, tending their garden, or evil. So... offpage people we never met fixed everything? But from what we’ve seen, the rebels are exactly as evil as the tyranny. (Not actually a profound point, by the way, and also one which inherently supports the status quo: if a rebellion will kill a lot of people only to install an equally evil government, then it’s wrong to rebel.) I'm fine with moral greyness and both sides doing terrible things, but the rebels were so awful that I didn't see how they’d be better than Capitol, other than not holding Hunger Games.
Regarding Katniss’s agreement to hold rebel Hunger Games, I interpreted that as a plot to kill Coin, based on Katniss's exchange with Haymitch. But it's never confirmed whether that was correct, or whether she did mean it but changed her mind at the last moment, or what she thought would happen after Coin died. It’s Katniss's one moment of triumph in the entire book, and we never learn what she thought she was doing.
If you haven’t started the series but you want to, I would recommend reading only the first book and possibly the second (though that one ends on a bigger cliffhanger), then writing your own ending.
The Hunger Games - Library Edition
Catching Fire (The Second Book of the Hunger Games)
Mockingjay (The Final Book of The Hunger Games) - Library Edition
Battle Royale: Director's Cut (Collector's Edition)
. Warning: very violent and disturbing, doubly so because it’s live-action and the teenagers look like (and I think are mostly played by) real teenagers, not young-looking adults.
Not only is Mockingjay awesomely depressing, but the elements I enjoyed in the first two books are absent. It lacks energy, and Katniss’s character has changed radically and off-page before the book begins: the angry, determined survivor of the first two novels is gone, replaced by a clinically depressed and passive girl who spends most of the book in a despairing haze, being moved around like a pawn by authority figures.
This was such a deliberately and consistently grim novel that I ended up sorry that I read it, and I rarely feel that way. The first two books were dark in ways which logically followed from the premise: the story was about kids forced to kill in gladiatorial combat, and kids were killed in gladiatorial combat. This one is dark in ways which logically follow from the premise, but also in ways which don't. Sometimes people act out of character solely so that horrible things can happen, and a climactic scene makes absolutely no sense solely so that the most horrible thing of all can happen.
My usual example separating inherently depressing from gratuitously depressing is a Holocaust novel in which everyone dies in a concentration camp, and a Holocaust novel in which everyone dies in a concentration camp except for the protagonist's true love, who is liberated, runs joyously across the street to meet her, and is squashed by a cement truck. Not only was the cement truck not a logical consequence of genocide, but by adding implausible elements to make genocide even more depressing, the entire novel and so the genocide it contains seem less real, and so defeats the author's purpose.
Mockingjay is a cement truck novel.
It’s not necessary to write a book which is no fun in order to point out that war is bad, nor is it necessary to make the book excruciatingly depressing in order to convey that the heroine is depressed. Aristotle wrote all about the paradox of audiences getting profound enjoyment out of watching horrific tragedies unfold onstage. The emotional state of the protagonist does not have to be inflicted on the audience to make the audience to understand how the protagonist is feeling.
The first spoiler cut only describes the first sixteen pages, which is one of the most stunningly depressing openings I’ve ever read.
The page numbering starts at 3.
Page 3: Katniss stumbles despairingly through the firebombed ash of her district.
Page 5: Drugged, concussed, and depressed, Katniss stares at the mounds of corpses and blames herself.
Page 6: 90% of her district is dead and it's all her fault.
Page 8: District 13, which she’d hoped was the Promised Land or at least okay, turned out to be a fascist hellhole.
Page 9: Peeta is being tortured by Capitol and his entire family is dead. Katniss breathes in the ashes of her friends.
Page 11. Finnick is brain-damaged and/or having a total mental breakdown.
Page 12. It’s revealed that Cinna died off-page. (Cinna was one of my favorite characters and at least deserved an on-page death.)
Page 13. Yay! A moment of happiness! Prim's cat Buttercup survived... by eating the corpses of Katniss's friends.
Page 16: It’s revealed that the girls who helped Katniss in the previous book, Bonnie and Twill, died horribly off-page. This is completely gratuitous - they didn't even have to be mentioned and it would have been completely plausible if they'd escaped, but are brought up just so Katniss can know that they burned to death.
Had I been normally browsing, I would probably have given up there. However, I was determined to stay at air-conditioned Borders to prevent heat exhaustion, so I continued, cool but depressed.
The next spoiler cut is for the rest of the book.
Katniss is depressed, despairing, and unmotivated on page one. There is nowhere to go from there, other than "total mental breakdown." (Or up, if it was the kind of book in which up was a possibility.) When she grimly realizes that Capitol will use Peeta to break her, I thought, "That's unnecessary!"
I was bored by the PTSD in this book. It felt very textbook, especially as everyone had the exact same symptoms. It was like "flashbacks, check; nightmares, check; jumpiness, check; loss of concentration, check; total despair, check." It wasn’t that it was wrong, it’s that neither people nor mental illnesses are cookie-cut-outs.
When Katniss briefly feels like she’s done something good by comforting the wounded, the hospital is promptly bombed and everyone is killed. The one person from 13 whom Katniss likes gets his legs blown off and dies in agony. Her entire team, except for Gale and Peeta, dies horribly.
Finnick, once a source of light relief and interesting complexity in that he seemed to enjoy his status as a sex symbol despite its horrific origins, reveals that actually he was a sex slave and was being raped and forced to pretend to enjoy it. He’s borderline catatonic for much of the book. When he recovers, gets married, and is happy, I immediately thought, “He’s so dead!” Sure enough, he is soon after eaten by lizard-dogs.
Katniss spends most of the book being passive, hospitalized, or manipulated by others. Nothing she does of her own accord in the entire book, up until the moment when she kills Coin, ever succeeds. Even her mission to kill Snow fails. Though apparently it provided a diversion, so the rebels could... kill their own medics, including Katniss’s sister. What?
The final cherry of doom on the sundae of despair is the death of Prim. The completely nonsensical way this came about illustrates how so much of the grimness was shoehorned in for its own sake, not because the story logically led there. If the bombs were dropped by the rebels, why did the rebels let their own medics rush in to be killed? If the bombs were dropped by Capitol, why would they take out their own shield?
The fact that we didn't even see the long-term consequences of Prim’s death made it seem dually wrong: only there to rub in that everything sucks, AND to make the happy ending even more unconvincing!
By the end, Katniss is utterly broken and suicidal, Peeta has been psychologically destroyed, Gale has turned into a monster, and nearly everyone Katniss ever loved or even met is dead. In this context, the happy ending is ludicrous. Also, her "choice" of Peeta is meaningless, as Gale took himself out of the running by becoming a brutal terrorist who directly or indirectly killed her sister, and living alone, in the state she was in, would have quickly resulted in her suicide.
Apart from her personal life, if we are to believe a better government was put in, who put it there? Everyone we know is either dead, tending their garden, or evil. So... offpage people we never met fixed everything? But from what we’ve seen, the rebels are exactly as evil as the tyranny. (Not actually a profound point, by the way, and also one which inherently supports the status quo: if a rebellion will kill a lot of people only to install an equally evil government, then it’s wrong to rebel.) I'm fine with moral greyness and both sides doing terrible things, but the rebels were so awful that I didn't see how they’d be better than Capitol, other than not holding Hunger Games.
Regarding Katniss’s agreement to hold rebel Hunger Games, I interpreted that as a plot to kill Coin, based on Katniss's exchange with Haymitch. But it's never confirmed whether that was correct, or whether she did mean it but changed her mind at the last moment, or what she thought would happen after Coin died. It’s Katniss's one moment of triumph in the entire book, and we never learn what she thought she was doing.
If you haven’t started the series but you want to, I would recommend reading only the first book and possibly the second (though that one ends on a bigger cliffhanger), then writing your own ending.
The Hunger Games - Library Edition
Catching Fire (The Second Book of the Hunger Games)
Mockingjay (The Final Book of The Hunger Games) - Library Edition
Battle Royale: Director's Cut (Collector's Edition)
. Warning: very violent and disturbing, doubly so because it’s live-action and the teenagers look like (and I think are mostly played by) real teenagers, not young-looking adults.
no subject
I did not, could not like this book. It was not a horrible book or a horribly-written book, but it felt a lot like a book designed to make its readers feel horrible. It was unrelentingly grim and depressing, but it was also dull—and since Collins was able to write excitingly and engagingly in the first two books of the series, all I can think was that it was dull on purpose, not through lack of skill.
Mostly, though, what I objected to was that Katniss never got to have any victories at all. Granted, she spent most of the book in a traumatized/depressed haze and didn't try to do anything, but even when she did try... Katniss goes out to comfort patients in a hospital? THEY ALL DIE. Katniss attempts to prevent 13 from killing all the workers in 2? SHE GETS SHOT. Peeta shows up again? HE HATES HER AND WANTS TO KILL HER. Katniss almost never got up the gumption to do anything, but whenever she did, she got swatted like a fly.
Even if you accept (which I don't, personally, because individuals with PTSD are still individuals and still react differently to different things) that the depressed haze was an unavoidable consequence of her trauma... even if you accept that, the problem is that the book's hopelessness is clearly not just internal to Katniss. It's not that Katniss is depressed and is therefore interpreting everything in the worst way possible and that's why the book is so grim. The narrative reinforces the grimness: it really is that bad, it really is hopeless and pointless, it really is better to dig a hole in the ground and hide in it than to do anything. (Until the peculiar epilogue, of course.)
Ultimately, between the fact that the rebels and the Capitol were both equally awful, and the fact that everyone who was happy got punished for it, and the fact that Katniss got smacked down whenever she actually tried to do anything positive--as did everyone else who tried to do anything positive--the take-home message seemed to be "There's no point in bothering to try. Everything is hopeless."
It was hard not to interpret as, "It was wrong to rebel. Everything is going to be just as bad after, because all politics and all governments are equally evil. If you try to get rid of despots, you'll only make things worse."
Which is a message that I personally find pretty unappealing. And it's a message that flies totally in the face of the prior books: in The Hunger Games, when all hope seems lost, Katniss decides it's better to die with dignity than give in, and manages to wrench victory (or at least a reprieve) from defeat. That Katniss seemed irretrievably lost, and I didn't like that at all.
And I really did want to like the book.
no subject
I feel like this is the bad version of Lloyd Alexander's fantastic Westmark trilogy.
no subject
no subject
.... Although I accept that people, when they're not thinking hard, believe things like "all political parties are alike," or "they'll all end up corrupt bastards in the end," it's hard for me to believe that anyone who thinks about it for half a minute can truly believe that all governments are equally bad or that it's not worth it to try to change a bad situation. ... So then I think, well maybe that's a product of this being The Future! Where Badness is Really Bad! It's so bad, there's no escaping it. But in the end, that undercuts the drama of the situation rather than intensifying it, because, as you say, it removes all motivation to change things.
no subject
It also didn't help that none of the good guys ended up in government, adding on a "government is evil and good people will have nothing to do with it" message.
I was thinking about how Lloyd Alexander avoided that trap in the Westmark trilogy, despite making the same point about war being bad and good guys doing terrible things too. I think it's because the series has many light moments throughout, so the world always seems worth saving and the characters don't seem irretrievably evil or damaged; the good guys keep their eyes on the prize and at least try to remember what they're really fighting for; the rebel leader isn't evil; and we know and trust the people who set up the government in the end.
no subject
no subject
I think part of the problem was that she was trying (maybe?) to show that even good people do bad things in war, but since we get thrown into the book with Katniss already despairing and disaffected, the "good people" part got lost. We didn't see how the leaders of Thirteen went from just trying to protect their people and keep them safe to committing war crimes; we jump straight in on the war crimes. Heck, we don't even see how Gale makes that transition: it happens mostly offstage, and it's implied that he made most of the transition to 'person who is okay killing civilians' while Katniss was sedated in the hospital. Also, Cinna, a genuinely complex character (Capitol-born, rebel-by-choice, working behind the scenes, seems to have a genuinely good heart) is killed offscreen before the book begins.
So the 'good people do bad things' message got swallowed up, with the result that the book is more like 'bad people are everywhere.'
no subject
Now I'm thinking, Sixth Sense-style, "I see bad people" :-P