rushthatspeaks: (Default)
rushthatspeaks ([personal profile] rushthatspeaks) wrote in [personal profile] rachelmanija 2010-12-30 06:53 pm (UTC)

Warbreaker was about the same-- it had a lot of actual conceptual coolness which kept me reading it. The magic system, which was based on color, was original and nifty and I was interested in the larger metaphysical implications, some of which he even went into. On a character level, there were some thing that weren't stupid, and then there was the rest of it. I can't say it was a bad book, because I think it did exactly what it was trying to do, but I think that his goals as a writer do not match what I think of as what that sort of book ought to be trying to do. I have mentally filed him under 'pleasant beach reading, lots of cool shit, do not expect much, worth time if tired'.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org