This post was not only prompted by a remarkably stupid NY Times review of the "Game of Thrones" TV series, in which the reviewer thought the story was a polemic against global warming, claimed that women don't like fantasy, and further claimed that women do love sex, so the sex was gratuitously crammed in to please them.
It was also prompted by curious fact that while many of the most successful, and by successful I mean bestselling, writers of YA fantasy and sf are women writing under clearly female names, and most of the bestselling writers of urban fantasy are women writing under female names, most of the bestselling writers of epic/high fantasy are men or women writing under male or ambiguous names.
To quickly define terms, by "urban fantasy" I mean "Set in contemporary world much like ours, but in which magic and/or magical creatures exist. Typically involves romance, fighting evil, and/or detecting." By "epic fantasy," I mean "Set in non-contemporary world which is not just our world plus magic or an alternate history of our world, big sprawling stories, typically a series of fat volumes, typically involves a huge cast of characters, war, battles, monarchies, and politics. Typically set in a vaguely medieval period."
I have some questions for you all.
1. Am I correct that the bestselling writers of epic fantasy are typically male or writing under possibly-male names? I'm thinking of Robin Hobb (woman writing under possibly-male name), Patrick Rothfuss, George R. R. Martin, Robert Jordan, Brian Sanderson, Tad Williams, Terry Goodkind, Terry Brooks, etc.
I am under the impression that the female authors writing under clearly female names, like Kate Elliott, Katherine Kerr, are midlist or at least not hugely bestselling authors.
Anomalies: Jacqueline Carey - bestselling, I think, but clearly female. Gender of names may not be clear to readers: Sherwood Smith, Mercedes Lackey. I think Sherwood is considered a midlist writer, while Lackey is maybe in between midlist and bestseller?
2. Is epic fantasy really read more by men than by women? In general, women read far more than men do. Is epic fantasy an exception? I would love to see some actual figures here, because I honestly have no idea.
3. Do male or male-seeming epic fantasy authors get a bigger marketing push from the publishers? Are readers more willing to buy their books? Why is this different from urban fantasy and YA fantasy? (Maybe the latter are considered "less serious," because of the association with romance and teenagers, and so the proper province of women?)
(I don't even ask, "Is epic fantasy by women reviewed less?" because we already know that answer. All fiction by women is reviewed less than fiction by men. One of many statistical breakdowns to that effect here.)
ETA: A brief reading list of non-bestselling female writers of epic fantasy:
Sherwood Smith: Overview: Yo, epic fantasy authors. I'm real happy for you, and I'mma let you finish (uh, sorry, George R. R. Martin, I swear that was not a dig) but Sherwood Smith has already written one of the best epic fantasies of all time. OF ALL TIME.
Buy on Amazon: Inda
Kate Elliott: Cold Magic (The Spiritwalker Trilogy)
Mary Gentle: A Secret History: The Book Of Ash, #1
Michelle Sagara: Cast in Shadow (The Chronicles of Elantra, Book 1)
P. C. Hodgell: The God Stalker Chronicles
Judith Tarr: The Hound and the Falcon: The Isle of Glass, The Golden Horn, and The Hounds of God
Barbara Hambly: Dragonsbane: The Winterlands Series (Book One)
(Note: This book stands on its own, and is a perfect work of art on its own. For the love of God, AVOID THE SEQUELS.)
Laurie Marks: Fire Logic (Fire Logic)
N. K. Jemisin: The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms (The Inheritance Trilogy)
Katherine Kerr: Daggerspell (Deverry Series, Book One)
It was also prompted by curious fact that while many of the most successful, and by successful I mean bestselling, writers of YA fantasy and sf are women writing under clearly female names, and most of the bestselling writers of urban fantasy are women writing under female names, most of the bestselling writers of epic/high fantasy are men or women writing under male or ambiguous names.
To quickly define terms, by "urban fantasy" I mean "Set in contemporary world much like ours, but in which magic and/or magical creatures exist. Typically involves romance, fighting evil, and/or detecting." By "epic fantasy," I mean "Set in non-contemporary world which is not just our world plus magic or an alternate history of our world, big sprawling stories, typically a series of fat volumes, typically involves a huge cast of characters, war, battles, monarchies, and politics. Typically set in a vaguely medieval period."
I have some questions for you all.
1. Am I correct that the bestselling writers of epic fantasy are typically male or writing under possibly-male names? I'm thinking of Robin Hobb (woman writing under possibly-male name), Patrick Rothfuss, George R. R. Martin, Robert Jordan, Brian Sanderson, Tad Williams, Terry Goodkind, Terry Brooks, etc.
I am under the impression that the female authors writing under clearly female names, like Kate Elliott, Katherine Kerr, are midlist or at least not hugely bestselling authors.
Anomalies: Jacqueline Carey - bestselling, I think, but clearly female. Gender of names may not be clear to readers: Sherwood Smith, Mercedes Lackey. I think Sherwood is considered a midlist writer, while Lackey is maybe in between midlist and bestseller?
2. Is epic fantasy really read more by men than by women? In general, women read far more than men do. Is epic fantasy an exception? I would love to see some actual figures here, because I honestly have no idea.
3. Do male or male-seeming epic fantasy authors get a bigger marketing push from the publishers? Are readers more willing to buy their books? Why is this different from urban fantasy and YA fantasy? (Maybe the latter are considered "less serious," because of the association with romance and teenagers, and so the proper province of women?)
(I don't even ask, "Is epic fantasy by women reviewed less?" because we already know that answer. All fiction by women is reviewed less than fiction by men. One of many statistical breakdowns to that effect here.)
ETA: A brief reading list of non-bestselling female writers of epic fantasy:
Sherwood Smith: Overview: Yo, epic fantasy authors. I'm real happy for you, and I'mma let you finish (uh, sorry, George R. R. Martin, I swear that was not a dig) but Sherwood Smith has already written one of the best epic fantasies of all time. OF ALL TIME.
Buy on Amazon: Inda
Kate Elliott: Cold Magic (The Spiritwalker Trilogy)
Mary Gentle: A Secret History: The Book Of Ash, #1
Michelle Sagara: Cast in Shadow (The Chronicles of Elantra, Book 1)
P. C. Hodgell: The God Stalker Chronicles
Judith Tarr: The Hound and the Falcon: The Isle of Glass, The Golden Horn, and The Hounds of God
Barbara Hambly: Dragonsbane: The Winterlands Series (Book One)
Laurie Marks: Fire Logic (Fire Logic)
N. K. Jemisin: The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms (The Inheritance Trilogy)
Katherine Kerr: Daggerspell (Deverry Series, Book One)
From:
no subject
And I think it's fairly safe to say that, despite all the pissing and moaning teh menz have been doing since the 1970s that women writing fantasy were rooning their crunchy sf, that the best selling fat fantasy/series authors have been men (David Eddings comes to mind as part of the list, though he is not doing as much these days).
From:
no subject
Who is reading is hard to say--there's been a dearth of studies on audiences for sf/fantasy (probably for all other genres). Presumably the companies do business type studies, but those aren't out there, and when I was looking for ANY academic scholarship on what women vs. men read, the ONLY thing I found was one study (available online, let me know if you want link/citation) that was an audience study of FILM genres, not book genres (lots of published stuff on what boys/girls read, but not the adult audience so much).
It's just...nobody really knows, and so the perceptions rule unchallenged, more or less, till something like this happens.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
http://andweshallmarch.typepad.com/and_we_shall_march/2011/04/this-is-how-much-i-hate-fantasy-fiction-which-as-you-know-since-i-am-a-woman-i-hate-so-very-much.html
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
N.K. Jemisin is another example, although I'm not sure that's on purpose! Another anomaly: Anne Bishop.
In my head, though, there's "fantasy" and then there's "epic fantasy" and plain "fantasy" is mostly by women and consists of everything I read in high school that wasn't by Tolkien: Robin McKinley, Tamora Pierce, Susan Cooper, Monica Furlong, Madeleine L'Engle, Margaret Mahy. Exceptions: Garth Nix's Abhorsen trilogy, C.S. Lewis's Narnia series, Philip Pullman.
The more I think about it, though, the more the line blurs. I do get a sense that there's some fantasy (which I mostly didn't read) that is mainly characterized by really, really long series. But the fantasy I read was by women.
I also thought that the gender stereotype in speculative fiction was that women read and write fluffy fantasy stories while men read and write hard, intellectual science fiction? *snort*
2. I don't/didn't read epic fantasy, except for Tolkien, unless we can count some of the authors I mentioned above in the just "fantasy" category. But my female friends in high school were ALL reading Terry Brooks, George R.R. Martin, Robert Jordan, Terry Pratchett, and Mercedes Lackey. My male friends were too, but not more. I think my male friends were more likely than female friends to read tie-in novels for things like Star Wars and L5R.
3. Don't know!
From:
no subject
All of those (excellent) authors write children's or young adult fantasy, not (adult) epic fantasy. Interesting, eh?
Sherwood Smith
From:Re: Sherwood Smith
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I do think the bestselling writers of the multi-volume MMPB series (David Drake springing to mind as yet another example) tend to be male or have male-sounding and/or neutral sounding names. Speaking personally as someone who reads fantasy and defines herself as female, people like Martin and Brooks and Goodkind and Jordan just don't appeal to me--I've read a few scattered volumes of these epics, but they never seem to be that great in terms of writing and/or female characters. David Drake I'd actually list as a partial exception to my objections on those counts, since I recall finding his books better than average in high school, but I didn't like them enough to keep up after about the fourth book or so. And the epic fantasy I do like--Kate Elliott and Michelle West, who are both awesome--has great writing and great female characters; I don't think that's terribly disconnected.
I also don't think it's a coincidence that Kate Elliott, who did get a fairly big marketing push, and Michelle West, who is getting one recently (or at least, much bigger than before) are both published by DAW. So is Cherryh, for that matter. In other words, I do think the major publishers market epic fantasy by men much more aggressively--and publish it too.
From:
no subject
late 1980searly 1990s, I read Robert Jordan because he was there.(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I do find that a lot of the historical fantasy I read is written by women. Morgan Llywelyn, Marion Zimmer Bradley, Diana Paxson...
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
2. Huh, interesting thought. When I knew people who read a lot of epic fantasy and/or a lot of sprawling fantasy series (Melanie Rawn's big books come to mind), most of them were male, but we were reading this stuff because we were in high school or early college and had the time to read big book after big book, or ten Zelazny titles in a week, or whatever.
3. I guess I'd want to line up male writers of urban fantasy as well, to compare big marketing pushes, but the only one who springs to mind and who has had a long enough career for comparisons is Charles de Lint. (T. A. Pratt--male--hasn't been publishing for long enough, IMO, and I have no idea how well marketed his books have been.)
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
NSF study on gender distribution in reading/watching SF. Okay, fair, it's not fantasy, but I think it's informative...
From:
no subject
These are the sales numbers, more or less, for the first four weeks after release date of the most recent hardcover high fantasy novel I could find for the given author.
Robert Jordan -- Knife of Dreams -- October 2005 -- 169,114 copies
George R. R. Martin -- Feast for Crows -- November 2005 -- 108,945 copies
Terry Goodkind -- Confessor -- November 2007 -- 103,443 copies
Patrick Rothfuss -- Wise Man's Fear -- March 2011 -- 65,811 copies
Brandon Sanderson -- Way of Kings -- August 2010 -- 21,247 copies
Terry Brooks -- Bearers of the Black Staff -- August 2010 -- 20,364 copies
Tad Williams -- Shadowheart -- November 2010 -- 6,993 copies
Jacqueline Carey -- Naamah's Curse -- June 2010 -- 6,711 copies
Anne Bishop -- Twilight's Dawn -- March 2011 -- 6,233 copies
Lois McMaster Bujold -- Horizon -- February 2009 -- 5,233 copies
Robin Hobb -- Dragon Haven -- May 2010 -- 4,216 copies
Katherine Kurtz -- Childe Morgan -- December 2006 -- 3,962 copies
Mercedes Lackey -- The Sleeping Beauty -- July 2010 -- 3,623 copies
Elizabeth Haydon -- The Assassin King -- December 2006 -- 3,057 copies
Elizabeth Moon -- Kings of the North -- March 2011 -- 3,012 copies (NOTE: only 3 weeks of data)
Margaret Weis -- Secret of the Dragon -- March 2010 -- 2,080 copies
C.S. Friedman -- Wings of Wrath -- February 2009 -- 1,887 copies
Sara Douglass -- Infinity Gate -- June 2010 -- 1,804 copies
Trudi Canavan -- Ambassador's Mission -- May 2010 -- 1,547 copies
Sherwood Smith -- Treason's Shore -- August 2009 -- 1,391 copies
Katherine Kerr -- Silver Mage -- November 2009 -- 1,232 copies
Kate Elliott -- Traitors' Gate -- August 2009 -- 1,154 copies
Michelle West -- House Name -- January 2011 -- 752 copies
Jennifer Fallon -- Palace of Impossible Dreams -- June 2010 -- 701 copies
Daniel Abraham -- Price of Spring -- July 2009 -- 424 copies (this makes me cry)
From:
no subject
Do you happen to know approximately where the lines are drawn between bestseller/midlist/didn't sell well?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
As a data-point, I read very little epic fantasy these days, and what I do is all written by women. I prefer my fantasy domestic, contemporary, or urban.
---L.
From:
no subject
Lacking actual data and basing my opinion only on bookshelves, I would say that publishers have figured out/decided that heroic fiction with female protagonists who have interiority* will find its audience in YA and in romance, but not so much in mainstream epic fantasy, and that sort of epic is often what women write. (Did the Deed of Paksenarrion, which qualifies under the above, ever reach the bestseller heights?)
* Is that a word? I'm groggy. I mean that the character's reactions and processing of those reactions are a significant part of the plot.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I don't know the readership breakdown on that series, but if you count the series as a whole, they have sold a trainload of books.
Marion Zimmer Bradley, too.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
But yes, the top names in thick, gritty, war-laden epic are undoubtedly male; you can add David Eddings, Joe Abercrombie, and Steven Erikson to that list, and many more besides. Anecdotally, I think they get read more by men, but I don't have data to back it up.
As for why that is . . . there's a pretty well-documented shift that as the proportion of women in an activity increases, the societal valuation of that activity decreases. And obviously we class certain topics as female (romance) or male (war). So clearly the Important Books are the ones about war, the ones men are (mostly) writing, and all the rest of that stuff is nice but not nearly as important.
I'd love to see sales figures for urban fantasy vs. epic -- not just the top names of, say, Hamilton vs. Martin, but a more comprehensive comparison of the genres. If it turned out that UF actually moves more units all told, I wouldn't be remotely surprised.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Or maybe someone was holding a gun to her head.
I think plenty of women like epic fantasy. I was waiting to pick up my younger son from a flute lesson, and there was a girl there, about 13, waiting for her music lesson. She was reading one of the books in either the Wheel of Time series or Song of Ice and Fire series (honestly, I can't recall which it was), and when I asked about it, she was completely with it. ... Which is to say, young female readers are still picking up these sorts of books too.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
Epic Fantasy Bounces Back
From:
no subject
I think your observation is pretty accurate. Depressing, but accurate.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Certainly the female fantasy reader is heavily courted by those Australian publishers who do publish/promote epic fantasy as a genre.
But it has not escaped my notice that the Big Name fantasy authors we import tend to be male, and particularly that the longer careers (ie the authors still in print on the bookshop shelves that were also there 15 years ago) seem to belong to international male names.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Comments on DW suggest that they are indeed bestsellers, perhaps for loose values of the term. (Top 10 on Locus.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
It's probably the reason I'm writing UF now.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From: