Normally I would be all over a book in which a pandemic kills most teenagers, leaves the survivors with psychic powers which are neatly categorized by color, and then throws them in concentration camps from which the narrator must escape and join the rebellion!

Every bit of that is my id. But this book was just meh. It wasn't bad. It wasn't great. It was just okay. Though the worldbuilding around the concentration camps didn't make a lot of sense, it wasn't spectacularly batshit like say The Fourth Wing. The colors assigned to powers were mostly non-intuitive, like green for extra-smart and blue for telekinetic, so I didn't find that interesting. The characters were okay.

Basically this book just could not begin to compete with the much higher-octane, more batshit, more dramatic, more OTT version of itself, which is The X-Men and many, many other comic books and manga/anime.
Posterchildren is a rather labored pun based on posthumans (mutants with powers) being called "posters" in this universe. Posterchildren can apply to Maillardet's Academy, which is much like Professor X's School for Gifted Youngsters.

This is what I'd hoped Cute Mutants would be: diverse teenage mutants exploring their powers and their relationships with each other. Posterchildren has 100% less Tumblrspeak, which made it much more enjoyable for me. The characters are very likable and the powers are fun when they're explored, though they aren't always. There's some important characters whose power never even gets mentioned, or if it did it was in one sentence and I blinked and missed it.

This is basically a novel-length New Mutants with original characters fic, focused heavily on just hanging out at school. It's a lot of fun if you go in with that expectation and the knowledge that it basically just stops without resolving any outstanding plot issues. There are a bunch of shorter subsequent stories but they're mostly about the supporting and minor characters.

I read this because it was in the Yuletide tag set, but then no one requested it. I'm glad I read it though. I enjoyed it and if an actual sequel ever gets written (unlikely) I would read that too.

You can get Posterchildren: Origins plus bonus stories at this site.

rachelmanija: (Books: old)
( Aug. 17th, 2023 09:41 am)
A couple years ago, I spent a very happy month reading this insanely epic webnovel. While on vacation in Europe, I re-read it. All one million words of it. No regrets.

What's Worm about?

It's about Taylor Hebert, a bullied teenage girl who gets the ability to control bugs, in a world where people mysteriously started getting powers thirty years before the book begins. She's a fantastic, memorable character - an antiheroine of the "the end justifies the means" variety - who means well (mostly), is often absolutely terrifying and mostly doesn't notice, is incredibly ingenious at using bugs to do basically anything, and carries an extremely epic story with ease.

The powers appear in moments of intense trauma (trigger events), and relate to that trauma and/or to the person's psychological issues in general. So people with powers have gone through something horrible and may be reminded of it whenever they use their new powers, or may have a power that's an ironic reflection on their problems, or one which would have prevented the trauma if they'd only gotten it in time. For instance, a person who blames themselves for not noticing that a loved one was suicidal might get the power to read people's emotions... when they trigger after the suicide. Unsurprisingly, people with powers (capes) tend to be emotionally damaged.

There's differences in how capes work in different countries, but in the US, capes are classified as heroes, villains, or rogues. Heroes are theoretically the good guys, but actually this means they work for the government and fight villains. Villains are theoretically the bad guys, but actually this means they're criminals or mercenaries who don't work for the government. Rogues are neither cops nor criminals, and there's not many of them; why is spoilery.

Taylor wants to be a hero, but her initial contact with heroes doesn't go well. She ends up going undercover in a group of teenage villains, the Undersiders. Her plan is to gather info on them from the inside, find out who their mysterious boss is, and then turn them in to the heroes. But in the classic problem with undercover work, she starts making friends with the people she plans to betray. Also, she's good at being a villain...

What's good about this book?

1. Taylor (Skitter). I fucking love Taylor. She's an all-time great character. I spent one million words with her, and I could happily spend one million more. She's ruthless, pragmatic, socially awkward, brilliant in certain spheres, angry, distrustful of authority (with good reason!), will go to the wire for people she cares about or wants to protect, and never, ever gives up. She's my favorite iron woobie and I adore her.

2. The characters in general. There's an absolutely enormous cast, and I could reel off twenty or so characters who are absolute favorites.

Without spoilers, I love Lisa (Tattletale), whose official power is information gathering and whose unofficial power is sarcasm; Rachel (Bitch - don't you dare call her Hellhound), whose power is temporarily turning dogs into giant monster dogs, who loves dogs and mostly can't stand people, and who has a character arc that rivals Taylor's; Sabah (Parian), a rogue who can control constructs made of cloth and so rides around on and fights villains with giant stuffed unicorns, teddy bears, etc; Lily (Flechette), a hero whose power of shooting big arrows turns out to have a lot more to it than is initially apparent and keeps hanging out with a certain stuffed animal controlling rogue...

For people who have already read the book, my favorites for whom it's spoilery to even say why I love them include Imp, Dragon, Defiant, Chevalier, Sveta, the Travelers, Faultline's crew, and (in a way) the Simurgh and Bonesaw, a psychopathic mad scientist who never matured past the age she triggered, so she's an adorable little girl who enjoys doing sadistic noncon surgery as an art form.

3. The plot. After a slightly slow start, it's incredibly page-turny, with one jaw-dropping twist after another. I can't say I couldn't put it down because I HAD to put it down, but I spent an entire month fidgeting through the rest of my life, itching to get back to it.

4. The worldbuilding. It's much more solid and well-worked-out than it appears at first, with a lot of things that initially don't seem to make sense worked into a satisfying whole. It also deals a lot with logistics: mild spoilers )

5. The powers. The powers are incredibly inventive and clever, and used in inventive and clever ways. They all have drawbacks and limits in addition to unexpected uses. For instance, the teenage hero Clockblocker (who announced his hero name on TV so his boss couldn't make him take it back) can temporarily stop time for anything he touches, but has no idea how long the effect will last other than the maximum time is ten minutes. If he freezes a sheet of paper in time and then lets go of it, that paper acts as a completely impenetrable shield for as long as his power lasts.

6. The majority of the ginormous cast of characters are women and girls. They're evil masterminds, child soldiers, loners, leaders, sociopaths, idealists, friends, lovers, mad scientists, fuckups, bureaucrats, assassins, caregivers, bruisers, artists, monsters, and anything else you can think of.

7. There's a canon FF couple who I really like, Lily/Sabah who have a really hot sexy commander/loyal knight relationship. But apart from them, there's a lot of femslashy relationships. In fact part of why I'd love more people to get into this is I'd like more tropey femslash for my favorite non-canon pairings (Taylor/Rachel and Taylor/Lisa). Taylor is a little black dress who goes excellently with many other characters as well. Plus there's a very unique and awesome canon het relationship (D/D to avoid spoilers) who could do with more fic.

8. So many crowning moments of awesome. SO MANY. It's epic and it feels it.

Why might I NOT want to read this book?

1. One. Million. Words.

2. Some iffy racial issues - not horrendous IMO, more "you can tell a white guy wrote that." However, there's also excellent non-stereotypical characters of color (such as Sabah and Lily, mentioned above.)

3. It's really dark, though leavened by the characters having senses of humor, and sometimes tips into grimdark/overly gruesome or gross.

4. The first couple chapters are noticeably rockier than the rest.

5. The fandom (which is mostly on Reddit, spacebattles, and another forum I forget) is oddly reductionist - I'm not saying Taylor is a precious cinnamon roll covered in ants, but the fandom tends to go way overboard in the direction of "every decision she makes is WRONG" and "she's an unreliable narrator so everything she says about her own motives is WRONG." Most of the fanfic is on two forum-style sites that both make my eyes bleed, and 90% of it is "Taylor has a different power." I don't think the presence of the author and a very influential podcast (We've Got Worm) helps.

What potentially upsetting content does it contain?: EVERYTHING. But particularly bugs, body horror, and bullying. Also, rape (off-page), gore, torture, dead children, dead dogs, child abuse, and multiple fates worse than death.

SOLD! How can I read it?

Waiting for it to come out in print or official ebook format is not going to happen, due to aforesaid weird fandom dynamics leading to the author deciding not to do it. So...

1. Read it online. If this makes your eyes bleed...

2. Email me at Rphoenix2 @ gmail and I'll send you an epub. If you do this, please pay Wildbow something via his PayPal or Patreon. This is not an offer with an expiration date - I'll send it along any time.

Okay, I'm intrigued! But it's too intimidating to dive into all at once.

So, would anyone be interested in doing an arc-by-arc readalong? I could put up weekly discussion posts.
Imagine the X-Men, but Tumblr. Or rather, as is explicitly textual, imagine the New Mutants, but Tumblr.

My new morning routine involves me googling superpowers in general, and my ability in particular. Nothing new ever shows up. The closest thing I found is psychometry, which is a psychic thing where you get 'readings' from objects, like you touch a wallet and know 'oh this person prefers dubs to subs i.e. is wrong' or 'the woman who owns this writes Dramione fanfic i.e. is kinda yikes.'

Four teenage girls and a trans boy get powers after kissing the same girl at a party. The girl, Emma, is just as confused by this as they are. Inspired by Dylan, who can talk to objects and is a huge fan of X-Men comics, they start exploring their powers and having teen drama.

I don't know my sexuality. I've read so much stuff on the Internet about it and I just get more fucking confused. My God, the hours I spent on AVENwiki. I used to think I was some kind of ace but then this thing with Lou started. He was the closest I had to a friend before the kissing part of our relationship started and now it's – well, it's different. Putting a label on it is complicated.

I've mostly managed to get my school uniform on while musing on gray-aces and demisexuals and the like...


But things get serious when they learn that while they all kissed Emma consensually (she created a spin-the-bottle app to see if she was really ace or not), a local 20-something incel transphobe forced a kiss on her and got powers which he's using to commit crimes and terrorize people. He must be stopped!

The powers are really cool - Alyse's ability to transform her own body based on the emotions she's feeling is creative and beautifully described, and Dylan's talking objects are delightful. I love the general idea of "updated New Mutants." I was extremely charmed by the reading list of X-Men comics at the end of the book, excellent choices all.

Unfortunately, I can only enjoy Dylan's narrative style for the length of a Tumblr post. Overall, the book was way too Tumblr-twee for me. But I bet some of you would enjoy it a lot. It's a five-book series, and the first three are 99 cents.

1981 SF in which humans attempt to colonize a beautiful but distinctly hostile planet, Destiny. Among many other problems, a one-off solar flare causes lethal mutations in the fetuses of most pregnant women. The six surviving babies are strange and have strange powers, and are reared mostly isolated from the rest of the colony.

This sounds very much like something I would like. Van Scyoc wrote another fantasy novel, Darkchild, which I like very much. And yet Sunwaifs joins the list of Van Scyoc books I bought on the strength of Darkchild, every single one of which had a cool premise and interesting ideas, but was ultimately unsatisfying for hard to pin down reasons.

The main problem here is the characters. Only the six mutant kids really get any characterization, and they're archetypes rather than realistic characters. Archetypes are fine and in this case make a lot of sense in context, but they're vaguely unlikable/unappealing and also generally vague rather than being vivid. There's a stolid bull boy with cow powers, a flirty/bratty bird girl with bird powers, an angsty precognitive boy, a plant boy who's always rushing around because he starts to root if he stands still, and an affectless healer girl who drains herself to heal. Some of them eventually get some nice twists on their powers, but they're largely more boring than they sound.

The most interesting character is Corrie, who was born intersex but assigned as female - I'm using female pronouns as that's what she uses in the book, though it's clear that the assignment was only an assignment. Her twin died in the womb and she remembers this, she has storm powers, and she believes that she's the avatar of death and destruction. She and the precognitive boy, Nadd, alternate narration in first person. It's very tell-not-show, and it feels like not much is happening even when stuff objectively is.

I liked the late reveals and the ending, but overall the premise was better than the book.

Read more... )

Both covers are accurate and convey the same scene, but talk about different vibes!



You can read this without being spoiled for more than the first few episodes by not clicking on the cut tags. Cut tags are spoilery through S4 E7.

Dr. Bright is a therapist who treats atypicals (people with powers). They are not known to the general public, but a secret sinister organization, the AM, studies them.

At the start, she has four clients we follow. Caleb is a sweet teenage empath who's struggling to not get overwhelmed by other people's emotions and who has a sweet romance with another boy at his school, Adam, who is not atypical. Sam is a young woman who time-travels when she gets anxious. Chloe is a college-age woman who is an extremely strong receptive telepath.

Read more... )

We learn early on that Dr. Bright has a secret agenda and wants to use her clients' powers for her own purposes. This is actually not my beef with the show or its portrayal of therapy. Obviously, it's unethical but the show knows it is and this is discussed a lot. Her clients learn what she's doing and why fairly early, and because she does have sympathetic motives they stick with her.

Read more... )

Chloe, the telepath, I think is incapable of tuning out other people's thoughts. (This isn't 100% clear but it seems like it.) If she attends a therapy session, she can/will read Dr. Bright's mind. That means that she knows everything Dr. Bright knows, including everything Dr. Bright's other clients tell her. She routinely blurts out stuff other clients told Dr. Bright to different clients of Dr. Bright. Effectively, no one can have any secrets or privacy around Chloe, not just because she knows things, but because she will tell everything she knows to everyone.

(Dr. Bright's clients all end up meeting each other, which sets up its own set of ethical issues which I'll get to shortly.)

If I was Dr. Bright dealing with this genuinely fascinating problem in a therapy ethics, there are multiple possible ways to deal with this. The best way would be to only see Chloe over the phone. Another might be, since my clients all know each other anyway and know this is happening, to ask them, privately and individually and after discussing it, whether they consent to Chloe knowing everything they tell me. If even one person says no, then all of Chloe's sessions happen over the phone, permanently.

If I was the writer of this podcast, I would make clear is whether Chloe is literally incapable of shutting up about other people's secrets, whether she can but it's difficult for her for whatever reason, or whether she just doesn't want to or get why this upsets people.

Why this is happening makes a huge difference! Especially since Dr. Bright is literally there to help people control their powers. If Chloe is incapable of shutting up and her other clients don't consent to having her blurt out everything they tell Dr. Bright, then all her sessions need to happen by phone so she can't read Dr. Bright's mind. If it's difficult for her not to blurt, then Dr. Bright should be helping her with this. If she just doesn't think it's a problem and so refuses to stop, she should be booted as a client.

In the show, the why is not made clear but it seems like it's difficult for her not to blurt and she doesn't want to stop. (At one point she complains how haaaaard and saaaaad it is for her to be expected to keep other people's secrets.) Whatever the reason, everyone keeps telling Chloe not to blurt out their secrets to third parties and Dr. Bright keeps complaining that the whole situation is unethical, but no one ever boots Chloe out of their life or asks Dr. Bright to only see her by phone or do anything about it. Chloe is portrayed as a sweet cinnamon roll too good for this world, but in real life, she would be murdered so fast.

Any time someone brings up Chloe blurting out everything other clients told Dr. Bright to third parties, Chloe or someone else points out that Dr. Bright was also unethical. ONE PERSON BEING UNETHICAL DOES NOT MEAN IT'S OKAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO BE UNETHICAL. ALSO, CHLOE, SHUT THE FUCK UP BEFORE SOMEONE SHOVES YOU OFF A CLIFF.

This brings me to my biggest single problem with the show: almost everyone in it is from the Crab Nebula. (On FFA, "from the Crab Nebula" is shorthand for "person operating off of an incredibly strange set of assumptions about life/human beings/everything.") The particular quadrant of the Crab Nebula is, I think, young people on Tumblr.

Read more... )

Almost everyone's values and ethics and reactions are skewed from how humans normally are, and they're all skewed in the same weird directions.

Read more... )

People keep defending the evil lab with "but they do some good work," which is true, but WHO THE FUCK CARES WHEN THEY'RE ALSO IMPRISONING AND TORTURING PEOPLE WHO SOMETIMES DIE AS A RESULT? The evil lab people say they don't kill anyone on purpose and their experiments aren't meant to kill anyone, which appears to be true, but WHO CARES! They literally grab atypicals off the street, lock them up, and do experiments on them and sometimes they die! Not killing them on purpose doesn't make that better!

As of season four, everyone knows they still have atypicals locked up and experimented on, but no one is doing anything to break them loose and they're still half-heartedly defending the AM as "they do some bad things and some good things, it's complicated." NO IT ISN"T!

And that's not all! There is SO MUCH Crab Nebula reasoning!

A telepath constantly blurting out your secrets to third parties? Worth resignedly bitching about but not worth doing anything about.

A time-traveler using her ability to spy on the evil organization kidnapping, experimenting on, and sometimes killing atypicals? BAD. INVASION OF PRIVACY.

A therapist telling one of their clients something another client told them in therapy? Unethical enough to literally say "So much for ethics!" in a "Oh well, can't be helped" manner.

A violent sociopath is seriously injured when attempting to kidnap your friend? TERRIBLE. THE WORST.

Guiltily not caring if that sociopath dies? TERRIBLE. THE WORST. (No one ever wishes him dead without feeling guilty about wishing harm on another human being. I wish people harm all the time because they're harming other people, and I feel no guilt about it, and those aren't even people who threatened to murder someone I loved!)

Using the word "rape" or "sexual assault?" Apparently so horrifying that it can't be done, even when people are explicitly talking about it, such as exchanges like this:

Character A: "Did he... do anything to you? You know, when he kidnapped you and you spent all that time together, I mean I don't know his sexual orientation but, well...?"

Kidnapped Character: "No! Absolutely not! Nothing of the kind happened."

YOU CAN SAY SEXUAL ASSAULT, THESE ARE ADULT CHARACTERS ON AN ADULT SHOW DEALING WITH TRAUMA.

Read more... )

There's this weird prudishness and naivete going on, which is especially weird given that the show deals very openly and explicitly about topics like trauma, mental illness, and sexual orientation. This juxtaposition feels very Tumblr teenager to me.

AND ALSO, when you have a situation where your clients end up all knowing each other and hanging out together, one's telepathic and two are empathic, and they don't have any real therapy options other than you, stop wringing your hands about the unethical lack of privacy and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

It's actually a very interesting problem in therapeutic ethics. The most relevant ethical frameworks I can think of come from group therapy and situations in which dual relationships and clients knowing each other is unavoidable, such as being a therapist in a hospital or in a very small town where you're the only one.

The solution that comes to my mind is to get everyone's input, first individually and then (if they all want) in a group setting. You could decide that within the group, you don't have secrets, but you cannot reveal anything from within the group to anyone outside of the group.

And this is just touching the surface! There's so much more, like why the fuck Dr. Bright wouldn't tell a client that the organization she's involved with KIDNAPS AND EXPERIMENTS ON PEOPLE LIKE HER when there is literally no reason not to tell her other than that-- HER STATED REASON FOR NOT DISCLOSING THIS - is that the organization doesn't always do this and is sometimes helpful WHEN IT DOESN'T DECIDE TO KIDNAP AND EXPERIMENT ON YOU WHAT THE ACTUAL CRAB NEBULA FUCK.

rachelmanija: (Lightbulb has to want to change)
( Apr. 26th, 2022 11:44 am)
Does anyone else listen to this?

It's a fiction podcast by Lauren Shippen about a psychologist who provides therapy for people with psychic powers (atypicals).

Things I normally can't deal with at all:

1) Fiction podcasts. I often can't tell the voices apart, and I generally find them annoying and hard to follow.

2) Fiction about therapists. They are invariably unethical, which is annoying because come the fuck on, this is not such a boring job that the only way to make it interesting is to have them be unethical. More often than not, they have sex with their clients, which ties with pedophilia and bodily waste stuff for my number one squick.

And even if they're not unethical and don't fuck their patients, they're generally bad at therapy, or they don't actually show much of the therapy and what they do show is 90% the client screaming at the therapist, or the entire therapy conceit is just a framework for the clients to talk about their lives, which is fine but they might as well be talking to a bartender.

However, I tried the first episode because I'm doing daily physical therapy for my wrist (Dequervains synovitis, thanks ivy!) and was bored. It was surprisingly listenable (normally I nope out of fiction podcasts within three minutes) and I am now partway into season four.

Why I am still listening:

33% it's entertaining.

33% hate-listening for bad therapy and bad ethics/boggling at "What planet are these characters from?! Who thinks this way?!"

33% I got extremely invested in a certain relationship - if you've listened to the show, I'm curious if you can guess which one.

1% like I said, lots of daily PT.

Before I post a long rant, mostly about "Who thinks this way?!" and "Why don't you stop saying 'Oh dear, this is terribly unethical' and try to come up with an actual goddamn solution to the ethical problem?!", I'm curious if anyone else is familiar with the show.

This children's SF novel starts with a lovely, haunting scene in which Alanna and her twin brother Mal are playing on the alien planet on which they've only just arrived. The scenery is colorful, and they discover that they can use the thin material of their protective suits to hang-glide on the wind. But Mal goes too high, and--

--Alanna wakes up on a spaceship. It was all a prophetic dream. I regret to say that that scene is the best part of the book, which is especially annoying as I picked up this book after reading the first few pages. Mal doesn't appear again till the last page, they never fly with their suits, and no one ever has any fun for the whole rest of the book.

I'm not surprised this book is so unknown, as while it has interesting ideas and imagery, it's really incoherent and jumbled and inconclusive.

Alanna is on a spaceship because Techmen have taken over the Earth and offered people food and medicine and other good things if they implant crystals in their foreheads, so the Techmen can suck their energy. Alanna's family were Independents who refused the crystals, so they've been packed off on a one-way colonizing expedition on a ship crewed by Techmen. Alanna meets a crotchety old man who the Techmen want, and they threaten that she'll never see her family again if she doesn't get them the old man.

Things which are never explained: why the Techmen want the old man, why they can't find him themselves given that everyone's cocooned in a spaceship they run, who the Techmen are, whether they're human or aliens or elves or what, how the Techmen got to Earth, and why the Techmen are escorting the Independents to another planet.

The cocooned Independents are chucked on to a planet, where Alanna gets separated from everyone and meets some alien rodents who she threatens for ages before adopting one as a pet. The Techmen again demand that she give them the old man, though at this point she has no idea where he even is. She meets an alien dog creature who kills some of the rodents (not her pet) and then it turns out they both can astral project and they take a tour of the planet where she sees an ooze devouring everything in its path. The dog creature explains that on this planet, everything gets glommed together and reconstituted as particles and then back to ooze. The Techmen kill Alanna's pet rodent before she and the dog shoo them away. Then she's reunited with her family.

Things which are never explained: How the colonization is going to work when the planet is covered in ooze that eats everything, why the old man was important, why the Techmen everything, why the dog randomly killed a rodent, why this book's editor didn't request more clarity.

rachelmanija: Image: Gugu Mbatha-Raw concentrates. Text: Save the World (Save the World)
( Nov. 24th, 2020 09:43 am)
If you watch just one movie I review this year, I recommend this one. Unless you're into horror, in which case I recommend adding His House and Us - sorry, they're all so fantastic that I can't choose between them.

It's about three generations of Black women with psychic powers in a world that's been hit by an apocalypse which is not plague, and yet will seem familiar in that life has been both profoundly affected, and is still ordinary; people still listen to music, and do chores, and get in fights with their moms. Fast Color is simultaneously thoughtful science fiction, a deeply satisfying low-key superpower movie with very likable characters, and a moving family drama about generational trauma and healing. The acting is fantastic, it's beautiful to look at, and it will heal your heart.

The story begins when Ruth (Gugu Mbatha-Raw, pictured in my icon) arrives in a motel with a look in her eyes like hell's on her heels. She hurriedly checks in after a brief negotiation over water, which establishes two things: this isn't quite our world, but a near-future one in which a severe drought has been going on long enough for everyone to get used to dealing with it, and that she is both desperate and broke. Once she's in her room, we learn that she has out-of-control psychic powers, and that she's not just fleeing from people who want to capture her, but from herself and her past.

The past, of course, always finds you. After some adventures which I won't spoil, she ends up back in her ancestral home, with her own mother Bo (Lorraine Toussaint) and her daughter Lila (Saniyya Sidney, of the late lamented (if only by me) The Passage), who she never knew. All three of them have powers, which are of a sort I've never quite seen before in fiction. The way they're filmed is absolutely beautiful, very original, and yet satisfyingly familiar in that they have ALL my favorite tropes about psychic powers. This would be a great fandom for psychic power-related hurt-comfort, for instance.

One of my favorite subgenres is people with superpowers just living their lives; lighting fires with a flick of their fingers to cook their lunch, trying to raise their kids when their kids are telekinetic and the wider world hates and fears them, airing family grievances over the dinner table until it gets so heated that a plate explodes. X-Men comics were great for having bits and stories like that in the downtime between saving the world. And now I have an entire movie about it. There's a big-picture aspect as well, but even in the big action sequences, it's still all about character and community and relationships, not explosions.

I can't recommend this highly enough. You can find it on Amazon Prime and Hulu.

I saw it too late to request it for Yuletide myself, but a couple other people did. Hopefully some fic will appear.

Fast Color

Five paralyzed kids live in a miserable room in Belleview, where they never get visitors or to go outside or have any activities, and the staff is largely uncaring. Their one consolation is that they have each other, one kind nurse, and their imaginations. But when Belleview is condemned, they're threatened with being broken up and each placed in different hospitals.

Brick, one of the boys, longs so hard to be somewhere else that he unexpectedly finds himself in a new world, where he sees flowers and sunrises for the first time. And some more mysterious things as well. He also finds that the world has healing properties--not an instant cure, but enough that them all going there and surviving there is feasible. He manages to teleport his friends and their nurse, who loves them and also longs to escape, to the world. But once they're there, they find new dangers they need to survive...

I loved this weird little book. It's full of things I love - psychic kids, healing and recovery, survival, suspense, portals, exploring a strange new world, outcasts, friendship, and coziness coexisting with danger. It's slightly dated but not as much as you might expect - racial diversity is described in somewhat dated ways, but the characters aren't stereotypes.

There is magical disability healing, but it happens slowly enough that the entire book is still about disabled characters doing stuff, and they're never seen as lesser because they're disabled. (They clearly could have stayed paralyzed but still had happy lives on Earth if their circumstances weren't so awful - if they could have stayed together, been treated well, and been taken out to spend time in nature.)

The book ends at a "and there will be many more adventures" point which is sudden but satisfying; I would have liked to have read more, but if there had been more, I'm pretty sure I would have still liked the first part best, while they were all just exploring the new world and figuring out how to survive in it.

Only $1.99 on Kindle!

The Magic Meadow

Davy gets kidnapped and given an implant that makes him vomit and lose control of bladder and bowels. DNF due to sympathetic nausea.

Also, apparently if you're transported by a teleporter often enough, it will teach you to teleport or alter you to enable you to teleport yourself. I've never come across this idea before and found it interesting but insufficient.

Reflex (Jumper Book 2)

A classic teleportation novel. Teenage Davy teleports for the first time to escape his abusive father, ending up in a place he sees as safe: the public library. He takes the opportunity to run away, and promptly teleports again (back to the library) when a gang of truckers try to rape him.

The first half of the book is a meticulous working out of how a smart teenager could do cool things with teleportation but no ID or street smarts. The second half is about him doing cool things with teleportation to foil hijackers and evade government agents. Both parts involve a whole lot of dealing with trauma, in an unsubtle but realistic way. There's a romance that never shows why Davy and Millie are into each other specifically, though it's pretty realistic about how undealt-with trauma is not good for relationships.

I found it maddening that Davy often makes no attempt to hide the fact that he can teleport and repeatedly does it in front of random people without ever thinking through the implications of that, even though he thinks through the implications of practically everything else. By the end of the book, the government knows all about him, he’s threatened to kidnap the President, and he can be stopped if he gets drugged or cuffed to something heavy. There’s a sequel in which I assume that comes back to haunt him.

The book was notably dated in two ways: New York City is a hellhole of crime where you can’t step outside without getting mugged, and a plane or ship gets hijacked about once a month.

I liked the first part of the book better than the second. The hijacking stuff was ostensibly higher stakes, but I found it dull and implausible. The teleportation mechanics were fun, though since they're so meticulously detailed that it bugged me a bit that there is no energy cost in teleporting. He can do it as much as he likes, as far as he likes, to any place he’s seen in person, and it never makes him tired. Where does the energy for that come from?

It never addresses the question of why Davy can teleport, other than to confirm that his parents can't. I'm guessing spontaneous mutation.

I read this years and years ago, and recall having basically the same reaction. I re-read it because someone (Layla?) said I should read the sequel, which I never picked up. On to the sequel! (I see that there are actually four sequels, one of which is a movie spinoff.)

Linking to paper version of book. I don't recommend the Kindle, which I read, as it loses the spaces to indicate transitions. Without them, the book seems to often jump, as it were, to a completely different time and space within the same scene.

Jumper: A Novel (I see that this version has been graced with "A Novel.")

This is an 80s sf novel about a super-intelligent girl who is the lone (or so it seems) survivor of an apocalypse. I read it when I was twelve or so, really enjoyed it for the female protagonist having post-apocalyptic adventures, and also registered that some parts seemed really skeevy. When I was twelve, I did not have a finely-honed skeeve-meter and a lot of stuff went over my head. Like, I did not really register the skeeviness of Piers Anthony until something like 30 books in. However, the skeevy parts of Emergence were relatively small parts of the whole, and there were not a lot of post-apocalyptic books with girl heroines at that time, so I remembered it with mild fondness.

As you can see, it has a very nice cover and I wish the whole book was like that: a young girl sets off into a depopulated world.

I recently found a copy, re-read it, and was fairly boggled by it. I then tried to describe the plot to Sholio, at which point I realized how much more bizarre it was than I’d even registered while reading. I think it was when I was saying, "And then her pet parrot bites the evil gynecologist – did I mention that she's telepathic with her pet parrot? - yeah, she's telepathic with her pet parrot, no, that's never really explained..."

It’s presented as the diary of Candidia “Candy” Smith. Pro tip: if the first two human beings your heroine meets after the seemingly total depopulation of the world result in lovingly described encounters with, respectively, a Foley catheter and a speculum, her full name should not be quite so close to the organism which causes yeast infections.

Candy, age eleven, is a supergenius, a sixth-degree black belt capable of shattering bricks with her bare hands and subduing all bad guys, and writes in Pittman shorthand:

English 60 percent flab, null syllables, waste. Suspect massive inefficiency stems from subconsciously recognized need to stall, give inferior intellects chance to collect thoughts into semblance of coherance (usually without success) and to show off (my twelve dollar word can lick your ten dollar word).

The entire book is written like that.

Her father luckily has the world’s greatest bomb shelter equipped with six months’ worth of food and water, plus a ginormous library. Candy is down there reading in the company of Terry, her pet macaw, whom she refers to as “my retarded baby brother.” Terminology aside, this is actually a very sweet relationship. (They do not at this point know that they’re telepathic.) The world blows up in a combination of nuclear strikes followed by plague. Candy listens in via radio to the world falling apart, knows to stay in for three months to avoid the plague, and emerges as the sole survivor (or so she thinks) of the entire world. Unsurprisingly, she freaks out.

But all is not lost! She goes to the home of her sensei to grieve, and finds a letter from him informing her that he moved to her town because he was involved in a secret study of homo post-hominem, the new step in human evolution, a supergenius and immune to all illnesses including the plague, and she was a rare example of one the study missed and so was raised differently and is also a lot younger than the study post-hominems. So all other post-hominems will still be alive. He helpfully gives her the address of one who’s closest to her age (21 – only ten years older) and “a direct, almost line-bred descendant of Alexander Graham Bell” and proceeds to yenta them.

Then, after explaining to her that she’s not human, she will form a new society with other nonhumans, and everyone important in her life was secretly manipulating her all along, he concludes, By the authority vested in me as the sebior surviving official of the United States Karate Association, I herewith promote you to Sixth Degree.

Cut for length and also super skeevy stuff about an eleven-year-old. Read more... )

Palmer did a sequel to this, “Tracking,” which appeared in Analog, which I never read. His bio says he’s a shorthand court reporter, which explains the shorthand but not much else.



He also wrote a book called Threshold, and then vanished from the face of the Earth. I guess his work here was done. I read it but all I remember was apostrophes; Amazon informs me that the aliens are called voor'flon. In case you're curious about Threshold, here's the first two Goodreads reviews:

One star: I just don't get this book. Is it serious? Is it a parody?

I toughed it out to page 31, wherein it's explained that the naked fairy might have the body of a twelve-year-old, but she's really fifty-two. So it's totally okay to stare at her breasts (that last part was implied).

The narrator is an insufferable Mary Sue (he's rich! he has perfect pitch!), the writing is purple, and the only good part is the talking cat.

Four stars: Man, I loved this book. It was cheesy as hell when I picked it up (in Norwich, mostly for the man riding a pterodactyl) and reading the first few pages -- naked girl and her cat proclaims to be space aliens to the multi-millionaire protagonist (who they reveal is precisely the ridiculously perfect human being he is because he's the end result of a thousand year long eugenics program, so that's alright then) and then fly the alien's planet where they get shot down and he's stranded naked at the wrong end of the planet surrounded by a huge variety of things that want to eat him.

King’s famous/infamous first novel. Most of you probably know the gist of it whether you’ve read it (or seen the movie) or not— it’s just that iconic— and it doesn’t matter if I spoil it in outline because King also tells/teases you with what happened right from the get-go. But if you don’t, it goes like this:

Carrie, who is secretly telekinetic, is raised in near-isolation by her abusive, mentally ill mom, a batshit fundamentalist whose beliefs bear only the most tenuous relationship to any actual religion. Carrie is not taught of the existence of menstruation because all things bodily are the Devil’s handiwork, and panics when she gets her period in the girls’ locker room shower. Because teenagers can be fucking monsters, she’s pelted with tampons by the other girls, who smell blood in the water in more ways than one.

Sue Snell, a girl who feels guilty over failing to stop the bullying, joins forces with some other teenagers to try to give Carrie a nice prom. Unfortunately, the hateful bully contingent also has plans for Carrie, and also at the prom. Let’s just say that Carrie doesn’t do anything I wouldn’t have done at that age and under those circumstances if I could’ve killed people with my brain.

I first read this book when I was a bullied teenager, so I was an ideal audience in one sense. However, it was neither the first book I read by King nor the one that made me go on to read more. (Those were The Stand, followed by Firestarter.) I liked it but I didn’t love it, which is still my feeling about it now though probably not for the same reasons.

At the time, though I identified with Carrie’s situation, I didn’t identify with her as a person. She’s sad and plodding and downtrodden and not all that bright; none of what happens to her is her fault, but in addition to circumstances caused by others (like her terrible clothes) her personality gives off an aura of victimhood that makes the bullies decide to pick on her rather than on someone else. (King is very, very clear about that part: bullies gonna bully. If Carrie hadn’t been there, they would have just selected a different target.) To be clear, I don’t mean that she’s insufficiently awesome for me to identify with, just that her flaws aren’t my flaws.

(I confess: when our ages matched, I found an unsettling amount to identify with in Harold Emery Lauder. I mean. His goddamn name is only one syllable off mine, and it has almost the same metrical emphasis. That’s not exactly a coincidence. In both cases, it was selected by a teenage writer because it’s unique, the meter makes it memorable, and it just sounds like a writer’s name. King really had my number. But that’s not a coincidence, either: name aside, it was his number, too.)

What’s most remembered about Carrie are the set-piece scenes. The shower and the prom scene are iconic for a reason, but there’s quite a few in the book that have that same extraordinary vividness of emotion and image. They’re bizarre and singular in terms of events (so you recall them) and depicted with perfectly selected details, like the sort of nightmare you wake up from to lie sweating and telling yourself “It’s not real, it’s not real,” and dread having again for the rest of your life.

The other notable element is the blistering, raw, absolutely dead-on portrayal of what it feels like to be a bullied teenager. And also what it feels like to be any teenager in the sort of world I was a teenager in, which I hope to God is less common nowadays, when high school was their society, adults did not give a fuck, and it didn’t make much of a difference that the majority of the teenagers were perfectly decent people, if self-centered in a developmentally appropriate way, because God help you if the bullies close their eyes, spin around, and come to a stop with their finger pointed at you. Tag, you’re it. Your life will now be hell for the next four years.

Sue Snell is a good person. So is her boyfriend. It almost saves the day. But, as in Cujo, there are other forces at work, though here it’s human factors rather than chance or fate. Bullies gonna bully, and Carrie is emotionally fragile, primed to snap by her abusive mother, and in an act of agency with truly bad timing, she’s been practicing her power. The kerosene was already pooling on the floor, but some assholes just had to toss in a match.

Finally, Carrie is not spectacularly but still quite nicely structured, partly in a way that King was later to make one of his trademarks (multiple plotlines coming together into a dramatic unified climax) and partly in one that I don’t think he ever did on that scale again, which was to construct the book largely out of “found materials,” like newspaper articles, court transcripts, interviews, etc. The latter is interesting but distancing, fine but not noticeably better than what a lot of competent writers could do. The present-day sequences are way more impressive and have King’s specific voice.

A lot of what makes King a great writer was there right from the start: the well-crafted structure, the storytelling, the memorable scenes and images, the way with character and place, the trainwreck you see coming, the sympathy with his characters even as you know that a lot of them are not going to make it, and the moral force.

Even more interestingly to me as a writer, it shows how he overall had the sense to build on his strengths rather than his weaknesses in subsequent books. The found materials? Only ever used again in small, judicious doses. But the idea that he could do odd things with structure and that he should feel free to experiment and write each book in the way he thought suited it? That stuck. And most of all, the willingness to just go there with whatever outrageous, taboo, gross, or “you can’t write that” image that popped into his mind. Forty years later, those girls throwing tampons at Carrie still feels dangerous. If he’d never written it and someone submitted it now, there’s an excellent chance they’d get the exact same “what the everlasting fuck am I reading?” reaction.

King wasn’t the writer who taught me the value of just going there (Harlan Ellison did that) but it’s a good lesson to learn. Maybe the best. You don’t have to be gross or horrifying or shocking. You just have to be true to your self. We all have an inner voice and outer critics saying, “This is too revealing, too embarrassing, too weird, too risky; if I write it people will know the inside of my head looks like that.” But the insides of all of our heads are full of weird, embarrassing, scary stuff. It’s powerful stuff, too.

Maybe it’s tampons and a bucket of pig’s blood. Maybe it’s walking trees and a golden ring. Maybe it’s you and a gun and a man on your back. Whatever it is, it’s the real deal. Go there.

Carrie
I’ll quote the cover copy, so you’ll see why I was interested in this.

"A masterful tale of ambition, jealousy, desire, and superpowers.

Victor and Eli started out as college roommates--brilliant, arrogant, lonely boys who recognized the same sharpness and ambition in each other. In their senior year, a shared research interest in adrenaline, near-death experiences, and seemingly supernatural events reveals an intriguing possibility: that under the right conditions, someone could develop extraordinary abilities. But when their thesis moves from the academic to the experimental, things go horribly wrong.

Ten years later, Victor breaks out of prison, determined to catch up to his old friend (now foe), aided by a young girl whose reserved nature obscures a stunning ability. Meanwhile, Eli is on a mission to eradicate every other super-powered person that he can find--aside from his sidekick, an enigmatic woman with an unbreakable will. Armed with terrible power on both sides, driven by the memory of betrayal and loss, the archnemeses have set a course for revenge--but who will be left alive at the end?"

The blurbs talked a lot about moral depth, complexity, and ambiguity. Between the blurbs and the plot, I thought I’d get The Secret History with superpowers, starring Professor X and Magneto.

The first fourth or so of Vicious is exactly that. The rest, not so much. I had very mixed feelings about the book as a whole, and not just because the actual book matches the plot but not the implications of the blurb. The first fourth is a stunning work of storytelling. I was absolutely glued to it. The compulsive readability wanes as the book goes on, but maintains reasonably well throughout its length. Throughout, the structure is cool, the prose is good, and many of the ideas are interesting.

Here’s what’s not so good: the characters. The two main guys seem interesting when they’re at school together – morally dark, sure, but Schwab does a great job there of suggesting complexity, hidden depth, potential for great good or great evil, etc. Then they become superheroes, and turn into one-note sociopaths.

Eli, who suddenly becomes a religious maniac serial killer, is more like a half-note. His POV sections are really boring. He’s on a delusional mission from God. He kills people because he’s on a delusional mission from God. That’s literally it. When he thinks of Victor, it’s just as someone he needs to kill because he’s on a delusional mission from God.

Victor either also becomes a sociopath, or was always one; it’s hard to tell. His POV is more interesting because he does think about things other than hurting or using people, but basically, he hates Eli (no complexity there) and wants to kill him, and will torture, kill, and use people without hesitation or qualms to bring Eli down.

I expected a fraught, love-hate relationship between them. Nope! They just want to kill each other. I expected moral ambiguity. Nope! They’re both sociopaths. Pitting one sociopathic murderer against another is not moral ambiguity, nor does it bring up interesting moral questions. “If a bad guy kills a worse bad guy, does that make him a good guy?” is not an interesting question. (Answer: No.)

There are three other POV characters who get much more limited page time. One is also a sociopathic murderer. Another is a collection of potentially interesting traits that don’t cohere into a real-feeling character, but at least is not a sociopath. The last is an actual, believable, three-dimensional, mostly coherent character who is not a sociopath. The book would have been more interesting if it had been entirely about her.

There may or may not be something about the process of becoming a superhero that turns people into sociopaths, or turns certain people into sociopaths. This is discussed but never really explored or resolved. Of the four superheroes who get significant page time, three are sociopaths but it’s unclear if they were before they got powers.

I recommend this if you’re OK with sociopathic POV characters and want to read a cat-and-mouse game between two sociopathic villains. On that level, it’s pretty good. If you’re looking for more human characters, I can’t recommend it. Which is too bad, because if the whole book was more in the vein of the beginning, when it seems like the characters might have actual depth and complexity, it would be stunning.

Vicious
Given that this is about a lesbian Latina boxer who is genetically unable to feel fear, I have no idea why it took me so long to get to it. It is not only exactly up my alley, but is very well-written, gripping, moving, sometimes funny, sometimes sexy, and probably of wide appeal even to people who don’t find that premise instantly charming.

In the not-quite-post-apocalyptic near future, the town of Santa Olivia has been cordoned off as part of a gigantic effort to seal the border between the US and Mexico. The inhabitants of the town, mostly poor and Latino/a, are stuck there, subject to the American military base on site but with no recourse from the government of either country. However, it’s not an orderly dystopia, but a poor and somewhat lawless town where people live their lives and have relationships and sports and happy times, even though conditions are hard and unjust.

Speaking of sports. The American military commander loves boxing. Once a year, a match is held between an Olympic-level boxer he brings in, and whatever man from Santa Olivia wants to face him. If the latter can win, he gets a ticket out of town. Needless to say, this creates a thriving boxing subculture, jumping at the prize that’s perpetually just out of reach.

But all this is prologue. The story concerns a young woman from Santa Olivia who falls in love with a fugitive from Haiti… a man who was experimented on and genetically engineered. Urban legend calls those men werewolves, but they can’t shapeshift. However, they’re stronger, faster, and unable to feel fear. He’s on the run and soon leaves… but not before fathering a little girl, whom he playfully names Loup.

The bulk of the story is about Loup growing up, mostly in an orphanage. Being unable to fear gives her an odd emotional tenor, not quite autism spectrum but similar. She seems strange to other people, and in her circumstances, being unable to fear means that she needs to hide herself lest she attract unwanted attention. But while she puts off some people, she intrigues others, and soon she’s at the heart of a little band of orphanage kids.

Loup may not feel fear, but she knows injustice when she sees it, and there’s a lot around. There’s also a local legend of a child saint, Santa Olivia, depicted as a little girl in a blue dress. Loup and her friends take on the role of Santa Olivia, stealth dispenser of justice. (In one hilarious scene, she creates a rain of live snakes.) And then there’s that boxing match…

I loved this book. The town and its people feel incredibly real, making unpredictable choices in the way that actual human beings do. The power dynamics, both social and individual, were also strikingly realistic. The relationships were wonderful, from Loup’s childhood buddies to her first romance to (my favorite) her relationship with an arrogant asshole male boxer who goes from being an enemy to a sparring partner to an unexpected friend.

This is written in a completely different style and tone from Carey’s Kushiel’s Dart books, so if you didn’t like those, you may well like Santa Olivia. If you did like those, you may also like Santa Olivia. There’s a sequel, but the story feels complete within the book.

Santa Olivia
Come for the apocalypse.
Stay for cupcakes.
Die for love.


Solid, inventive, well-characterized YA science fiction. By “science fiction,” I mean “cool powers and alien invasion,” not “paper-thin dystopia in which the government’s main concern appears to be micro-managing the love triangles of teenagers.”

Madeleine, an aspiring artist, visits Sydney to paint her cousin Tyler’s portrait. Tyler is a famous cross-dressing actor, and probably my favorite character in the book despite his comparatively small part.

Her plans are stymied by an alien invasion. Starry towers rise up from the cities, and dust falls from the sky. Some people are given powers, others strange vulnerabilities, and still yet others are possessed by aliens. Stars shine from Madeleine’s skin, and she gets together with other teenagers to learn to use their powers and try to save the world.

The opening sequence, in which Madeleine tries to escape from a wrecked subway station, gets the book off to a great start. I stalled out for a while in a slow sequence in which the teenagers are interminably holed up in a hotel, but the story picks up enormously after that.

Host has a lot of respect for teenagers, and I liked the unabashedly heroic tone of the story. Rather than taking the apocalypse as an excuse for an orgy of rape and cannibalism, Host’s characters band together, form a community, explore their new relationships, take the time to make plans that make sense, and risk their lives for a cause they believe in. It’s engaging, uplifting, and, by the end, surprisingly moving.

This isn’t a flawless novel. Some events are confusing or poorly set-up, some of the dialogue is clunky, and I read the explanation of the alien invasion three times and I still don’t understand it. Too many characters are introduced in too-quick succession, and I didn’t realize that “Emily” and “Millie” were the same person with a nickname until I got to the cast of characters at the end. The sequence at the end with Gavin was really confusing, too. The book could have used one more rewrite.

However, so could at least half of the professionally edited YA novels I’ve read recently, many of which have glaring continuity errors, nonsensical motivations, ridiculous worldbuilding, unlikable characters, and, often, proofreading errors and poor formatting. In some cases, they are nothing but a string of action sequences strung together by plot holes.

And All the Stars isn’t Code Name Verity. But it’s imaginative, well-thought-out, and heartfelt. I will definitely read more of Host’s books.

Giant spoilers lurk below.

Read more... )

And All the Stars. Only $4.99!

Host self-publishes because of the glacial pace of traditional publishing, which got one of her novels stuck in review for TEN YEARS.

But there may be other reasons as well, which have nothing to do with the quality of her writing. Again, I'm not saying that she's one of the absolute best YA writers out there. But based on this, she's certainly one of the better ones. And when I say "better ones," I mean "compared to all the YA novels I've been reading that come out from major publishers," not "compared to the slush pile."

Speaking only of American publishing, which is the only publishing I know anything about, I can see why this novel would be a hard sell. It is not set in America, it involves aliens, and the tone and style are different from most YA sf I've read recently. (And there are gay characters, though in the supporting cast.) For a first-time author, those could be insurmountable obstacles.

M. C. A. Hogarth has a thought-provoking article on those issues. Maybe the audience for books about middle-aged female Hispanic space Marines is small. Maybe the audience for psychic Australian teenagers fighting aliens is small. But I'm glad that e-publishing makes it possible now for those books to find their audience.
A sleepy California town is enclosed in a mysterious barrier at the same instant that, pop! Everyone over the age of 14 vanishes. And some kids get psychic powers. (Actually, some got their powers several months before the pop - no word yet on why.) And animals mutate.

Flying rattlesnakes! Talking coyotes! Kids running around with tentacle arms and telekinesis!

This would be utterly and completely up my alley... except for the non-existent characterization.

The characters are either good kids trying to do right, with maybe one or two other traits, like "leadership abilities" or "bulimic," or complete psychopaths, with maybe one or two other traits like "intelligent" or "seductive." Speaking of which, I don't love the stock character of the sociopathic manipulative seductress in general, but it is about 500% more skeevy when she's fourteen.

Cool mutant animals. Cool mutant powers. But, alas, I didn't care about any of it.

I also disliked the disjunct between the flat emotional tone (probably due to the paper-thin characterization) and the amount of horrific stuff happening to children, and by that I mean kids way younger than 14.

Spoiler for child harm.

Read more... )

Also could have benefited from characters I cared about. And less retro gender roles. Girls run the daycare and infirmary, boys run law enforcement and government.

There are three girls with powers that could be used in a fight. Two are not introduced till near the end, and the third dies on the same page she's introduced. The main boys' powers are very strong telekinesis, super-strength, laser beams, teleportation, monster-type physical alterations accompanied by super-strength, and altering reality. The main girls' powers are healing, sensing how powerful other mutants are, and sensing how awesome the hero is.

I am not kidding about the last one. Astrid, the love interest, has the power to sense how awesome people are. She's not sure what this literally corresponds to, except that it doesn't seem to just be about who has the most bad-ass power. (The latter is a power another girl has.) But she assures the hero that her mutant power has detected that he is objectively the most important person she has ever met.

A really fun premise and some intriguing mysteries, but not enough to make me continue the series.

Gone
I have often had this book recommended to me as a small classic of YA sf in the subcategories of post-apocalyptic, psychic kids, and Australian. It was written in 1987, when there wasn't quite such a glut of psychic kid and post-apocalyptic YA as accumulated later on. But it was still unimpressive.

As is explained in prologue of infodump, after a nuclear war, mutations and science were banned. Mutants can be executed or exiled if caught.

Teenage Elspeth is a telepathic mutant who can read minds, force people to do her bidding, and communicate with animals. She also has other extremely powerful abilities which are revealed later, when it's convenient for her to be able to unlock doors and kill people with her brain. Despite these abilities, her family has been executed and she is in a precarious position, under threat of death if her talents are discovered. Her brother, a teenage total jerk, has a somewhat higher status for reasons I forget and is not very helpful to her.

She ends up exiled to a prison/lab/boarding house for teenage mutants. There she is forced to slave in the kitchens, while sinister experiments are going on off-page. This section occupies about two-thirds of the book, and it felt like absolutely nothing was going on.

I was mostly bored by the book. Elspeth has very little personality. In fact, the only character with personality is a stray cat. Though a summary of events would make it seem like exciting things are happening, they are often narrated rather than shown, and are so underdeveloped that the sense is that nothing is happening. Dullsville.

Obernewtyn: The Obernewtyn Chronicles 1
The author of this book collected a set of peculiar vintage found photographs, some altered to produce apparent wonders, some merely odd. I assume he created the splendid pen name of Ransom Riggs. He wrote an evocative first chapter built around a few of the photos, about a Holocaust survivor who tells fantastical stories to his grandson, which only the boy believes.

And then, his invention exhausted, he wrote several more hundred pages of half-haphazard, slow-paced, off-key story to fill out the rest of the book, interspersed with more found photographs which sometimes seem to have dictated the plot, and sometimes seem to be there solely because the premise of the novel was “built around found photos,” but have no apparent relevance. Distractingly, the photos don’t even always match the text, and not in a deliberately unsettling or spooky manner. They’re just wrong, like using one photo of a child and one of a different and much older person, and claiming they’re both of the same teenage character.

The plot follows Jacob, the grandson, now sixteen, who witnesses his grandfather’s death at the hands of the monsters he always feared. Could the monsters of his grandfather’s stories be real? Jacob’s shallow, poorly characterized parents send him to a psychiatrist. But Jacob manages to convince his father that they should go to Wales, where his grandfather lived at a home for refugee children, which he described as a magical place, so that Jacob can prove to himself that his grandfather’s stories were fantasies. Jacob, of course, really wants to prove that they were real. Naturally, they are: he finds the house, suspended in time, and still full of magical kids.

This sounds right up my alley. And yet nearly everything was wrong with it, starting with the voice. Jacob’s narration usually sounds like it was written by a literary-minded adult, with discordant breaks into unconvincing teenage slang when Riggs remembers that he’s supposed to be sixteen. He does not have any characterization, and neither does anyone else in the story except for the mostly off-page grandfather – the book’s only truly believable and interesting character— and some caricatured Welsh people. (The slang phrase meaning "to tease someone; to pull someone's leg" is "taking the piss," not "taking a piss," right?)

The peculiar children have powers but no personalities. There is a bizarre romance between Jacob and one of the peculiar kids, who due to being trapped in time also had a romance with Jacob’s grandfather. EW.

The pace is slow, except when a lot of pell-mell action suddenly occurs at the end, leading to a great big “to be continued” non-ending.

But my biggest problem was with the lack of atmosphere, in a book which probably hit the bestseller lists based on its promise of a delicate, nostalgic spookiness. Except for the first chapter or two, there is very little of that. The overwhelming impression of the book is blandness. The package is beautiful, but when you open it, there’s nothing inside.

Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children
.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags