You write beautifully sarcastic reviews despite the knowledge that outraged fans will probably still be upset ten years from now about what you said about David Clement-Davies’ therapy-seeking wolves. You’ve also written some lovely poetry.

You were my biggest cheerleader and source of encouragement long before I sold my memoir and proved your prediction about it right. If I’ve neglected to tell you just how much I appreciated that… I really appreciated it. Because you never praise anything that you don’t think deserves it, and you have good taste.

You’re a devastatingly honest person. Yes, this is a virtue.

You kicked down Hell's exit door and walked out without leaving behind the usual tolls: your sense of humor, your courage, your vulnerability, or your ability to care about other people.

And I love those rockin’, witty icons you made me.
You write beautifully sarcastic reviews despite the knowledge that outraged fans will probably still be upset ten years from now about what you said about David Clement-Davies’ therapy-seeking wolves. You’ve also written some lovely poetry.

You were my biggest cheerleader and source of encouragement long before I sold my memoir and proved your prediction about it right. If I’ve neglected to tell you just how much I appreciated that… I really appreciated it. Because you never praise anything that you don’t think deserves it, and you have good taste.

You’re a devastatingly honest person. Yes, this is a virtue.

You kicked down Hell's exit door and walked out without leaving behind the usual tolls: your sense of humor, your courage, your vulnerability, or your ability to care about other people.

And I love those rockin’, witty icons you made me.
rachelmanija: (Firebird)
( Jan. 24th, 2005 08:55 am)
You are cool because you reprinted not one— not two— not three— but something like ten of my all-time favorite fantasy novels.

You are cool because you gave even the ones I’m not so crazy about such gorgeous covers that I keep standing in the bookstore debating over whether I should buy them anyway.

You are cool because you talk to teenagers about what they want to read.

You are cool because you write such snarky, pithy journal entries.

You are cool because you endure dental torment without completely losing it the way I typically do.

And your hair—your flowy, wavy, luxuriant, Pre-Raphaelite, manga-worthy, red red hair-- is so cool that it really deserves its own entry.
rachelmanija: (Firebird)
( Jan. 24th, 2005 08:55 am)
You are cool because you reprinted not one— not two— not three— but something like ten of my all-time favorite fantasy novels.

You are cool because you gave even the ones I’m not so crazy about such gorgeous covers that I keep standing in the bookstore debating over whether I should buy them anyway.

You are cool because you talk to teenagers about what they want to read.

You are cool because you write such snarky, pithy journal entries.

You are cool because you endure dental torment without completely losing it the way I typically do.

And your hair—your flowy, wavy, luxuriant, Pre-Raphaelite, manga-worthy, red red hair-- is so cool that it really deserves its own entry.
In a near-future America in which criminals are sentenced to mind-altering treatments and there is a pre-birth cure for autism, and yet in which everything else seems exactly the same as it is now, Lou Arrendale and his co-workers are the last autistics born before the cure. They have a tailored work environment which allows them to use their savant-like talents to do some vague work for their company, and generally function perfectly well as they are, so long as no one tries to force them to be more "normal." But someone invents a cure for people who were already born autistic, and Lou's extremely evil supervisor decided to force all the autistic workers to take it. While Lou and his friends try to decide if they want to take it or not, Lou contemplates making a move on a non-autistic woman at his fencing club, and becomes the target of an extremely evil unknown person.

I think this came out in the same year as another book with an autistic protagonist, Mark Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time. The latter is much better-- more smoothly written, less predictable, funnier, more convincing, and with more sympathetic and believable characters. Moon's book gets points for ambition and readability, but would have been much better if she had skipped the contrived and melodramatic plot elements and just written a book about an autistic man who is offered a cure. The best parts of the book are the scenes where not much is happening except for Lou going about his daily life. If the whole book was about that, showing us how he sees the world, I would have liked it much better than the overplotted book I got.

As it is, it's obvious to most of the characters other than Lou that what the evil supervisor is doing is illegal, and several of them pitch in to help him out. So there's no suspense about whether or not the evil guy will get his way, and Lou himself doesn't have to take significant action. The plotline with the woman he likes doesn't go anywhere, and the one with his unknown stalker is pointless except for giving Lou something to do other than contemplate the cure. And while there are lots of evil people in real life, Moon fails to convince me that the ones in her book are there for any other reason than to draw hisses and boos.

Lou's final decision is not clearly motivated, and the epilogue seems to contradict the message in the rest of the book. I think it was meant to be deep and thought-provoking, but it's so brief and so little information is given in it that it leaves the impression that Moon herself didn't know what point she was trying to make.
In a near-future America in which criminals are sentenced to mind-altering treatments and there is a pre-birth cure for autism, and yet in which everything else seems exactly the same as it is now, Lou Arrendale and his co-workers are the last autistics born before the cure. They have a tailored work environment which allows them to use their savant-like talents to do some vague work for their company, and generally function perfectly well as they are, so long as no one tries to force them to be more "normal." But someone invents a cure for people who were already born autistic, and Lou's extremely evil supervisor decided to force all the autistic workers to take it. While Lou and his friends try to decide if they want to take it or not, Lou contemplates making a move on a non-autistic woman at his fencing club, and becomes the target of an extremely evil unknown person.

I think this came out in the same year as another book with an autistic protagonist, Mark Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time. The latter is much better-- more smoothly written, less predictable, funnier, more convincing, and with more sympathetic and believable characters. Moon's book gets points for ambition and readability, but would have been much better if she had skipped the contrived and melodramatic plot elements and just written a book about an autistic man who is offered a cure. The best parts of the book are the scenes where not much is happening except for Lou going about his daily life. If the whole book was about that, showing us how he sees the world, I would have liked it much better than the overplotted book I got.

As it is, it's obvious to most of the characters other than Lou that what the evil supervisor is doing is illegal, and several of them pitch in to help him out. So there's no suspense about whether or not the evil guy will get his way, and Lou himself doesn't have to take significant action. The plotline with the woman he likes doesn't go anywhere, and the one with his unknown stalker is pointless except for giving Lou something to do other than contemplate the cure. And while there are lots of evil people in real life, Moon fails to convince me that the ones in her book are there for any other reason than to draw hisses and boos.

Lou's final decision is not clearly motivated, and the epilogue seems to contradict the message in the rest of the book. I think it was meant to be deep and thought-provoking, but it's so brief and so little information is given in it that it leaves the impression that Moon herself didn't know what point she was trying to make.
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags