Re: Hooks in literature

Date: 2010-12-05 03:35 am (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
In my opinion, which is doubtless shaded by having seen the movie first, the movie is better and funnier. Terry Southern was less a novelist than a film writer, and the contributions of other hands than his to the film enrich it greatly; the book, by comparison, is a series of vignettes without arc or climax, oddly monotonous. There are good bits, but they don't hang together, and the movie makes more out of the ideas it takes from the book than the book does.

Also, Peter Sellers and Ringo Starr!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags