Sequel to Every Heart a Doorway. There's also a prequel, but since the first book already told me exactly what happened in it I haven't read it.
Despite avoiding the worst flaw of Every Heart A Doorway (focusing on a terrible murder mystery rather than on the concept of "school for returned portal adventurers") and instead actually focusing on the concept, Beneath the Sugar Sky is nevertheless extremely similar to the first book: pretty language, fun concepts, sledgehammer preachiness on worthy issues, one-dimensional characters, one-dimensional portal worlds.
One of my big problems with EHaD was that the portal worlds mostly summed up as "Everything is [X]." Everything is skeletons, everything is candy, everything is bugs. This... well... bugged me as most portal worlds in literature are not actually "everything is X." Oz does have lands where everything is candy/china/glass/etc, but Oz as a whole is partly a huge patchwork of many such lands and partly made of lands that don't fit that one-note mold. "Everything is X" is more a hallmark of allegory and thought experiment than portal fantasy: Flatland rather than Narnia.
That being said, I am currently reading a fantasy series by Adrian Tchaikovsky, "Shadows of the Apt," which really is "everything is bugs." But it's so detailed and thought-out that the overwhelming bugness becomes charming and believable rather than one-note. I was hoping for something like this in Beneath a Sugar Sky, in which the characters travel to Confection, where everything is candy. I didn't quite get it. Everything is candy, all right: a sea of soda, a farm of candy corn, a sword of sugar. But there's nothing much beyond that, and the whole book feels thin and stretched as a strand of taffy.
If you loved Every Heart A Doorway, you will love this. If you didn't, you will probably feel the same way about this.


Despite avoiding the worst flaw of Every Heart A Doorway (focusing on a terrible murder mystery rather than on the concept of "school for returned portal adventurers") and instead actually focusing on the concept, Beneath the Sugar Sky is nevertheless extremely similar to the first book: pretty language, fun concepts, sledgehammer preachiness on worthy issues, one-dimensional characters, one-dimensional portal worlds.
One of my big problems with EHaD was that the portal worlds mostly summed up as "Everything is [X]." Everything is skeletons, everything is candy, everything is bugs. This... well... bugged me as most portal worlds in literature are not actually "everything is X." Oz does have lands where everything is candy/china/glass/etc, but Oz as a whole is partly a huge patchwork of many such lands and partly made of lands that don't fit that one-note mold. "Everything is X" is more a hallmark of allegory and thought experiment than portal fantasy: Flatland rather than Narnia.
That being said, I am currently reading a fantasy series by Adrian Tchaikovsky, "Shadows of the Apt," which really is "everything is bugs." But it's so detailed and thought-out that the overwhelming bugness becomes charming and believable rather than one-note. I was hoping for something like this in Beneath a Sugar Sky, in which the characters travel to Confection, where everything is candy. I didn't quite get it. Everything is candy, all right: a sea of soda, a farm of candy corn, a sword of sugar. But there's nothing much beyond that, and the whole book feels thin and stretched as a strand of taffy.
If you loved Every Heart A Doorway, you will love this. If you didn't, you will probably feel the same way about this.