![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Twelve-year-old orphan Maggie flames out of a succession of schools, as she’s decided that since everyone will hate her anyway, the best thing to do is make sure that happens immediately to skip the disappointment. She’s then sent to live with two awful aunts and a very strange uncle in a giant house where she discovers two living dolls and a living china dog in the attic.
I read this book when I was a kid and found it memorable without actually liking it, partly because I was very confused by the ending. I re-read it to see if the ending would make more sense as an adult, and also if I’d like it more. (Respectively, sort of and no.)
Maggie has two habits which make sense under the circumstances, but which did not endear her to me. One was her method of pre-emptively making people hate her, which was to be as mean and obnoxious as possible. The other is a mental game in which she explains ordinary things to the imaginary “Backwoods Girls,” who have never heard of anything, while she calls them stupid. This is present throughout the book, and goes on and on and ON for page after page after page. It was beyond tedious.
Her aunts are plain terrible. Her uncle is clearly supposed to be endearing, but he speaks entirely in unfunny whimsical jokes and flights of fancy, and literally never says anything normal ever, not even when it’s clear that his “humor” is confusing and upsetting Maggie.
The living dolls are in an extremely Uncanny Valley in that I think they’re supposed to be slightly creepy but mostly lovable, but came across to me as mostly creepy but not in a scary or fun/scary way. They’re dolls possessed or animated by the spirits of Maggie’s ancestors who died in a fire, and sit drinking imaginary tea and reading the newspaper headline about their death without ever understanding that’s what it is, and having the same conversations over and over and over. This afterlife seems more subtly horrific than sweet to me, especially as the way they keep looping through the same conversations and not remembering things is unintentionally reminiscient of dementia. Or maybe that is intentional, who knows.
Maggie gets angry and smashes the dolls around, cracking the male doll’s head and knocking off the dog’s ear and detaching the woman doll’s leg. She fixes them later, but damaging inanimate but sentient things, especially if they feel pain as these dolls do, is a huge squick/creep-out for me and did not endear her to me.
I like a lot of stuff that’s dark in some way or another, whether it’s scary horror or just deals with dark topics, but this book just felt unpleasant and unenjoyable.
Spoilers!
I read some reviews that said that the dolls are imaginary and Maggie is just creative and/or hallucinating. I don’t think this is supported by the text, as she learns things from the dolls that she only confirms later, and obtains items from the dolls that are from the past. Still, it is the sort of book where that reading isn’t totally out of the blue. She does hear the dolls as voices no one else can hear long before she finds them.
There is never any explanation of why her ancestors and their dog are now dolls, whether they’re animating pre-existing dolls or were literally transformed into dolls, or if everyone in the family becomes dolls after death or if it’s just them.
The dolls revert to being inanimate when Maggie is caught by her aunts with them. They only come alive again when the uncle dies and Maggie is about to be sent away again. The ending very clearly implies that the uncle is about to join them as a doll himself. This is played as heartwarming but I found it creepy. Though I have to say, he and his inability to have a sane conversation ever would fit right in!
When I was a kid, I thought probably the uncle had become a doll, but I wasn’t completely sure as you don’t actually see this and it’s not explicitly stated. Reading it now, it’s clear that he definitely becomes a doll.
So, when Maggie dies, will she too join the dolls in the attic? EEK!
Did any of you read this book? Did you like it better than I did? It’s widely beloved and won lots of awards, but appears to be currently out of print.
Behind the Attic Wall
I read this book when I was a kid and found it memorable without actually liking it, partly because I was very confused by the ending. I re-read it to see if the ending would make more sense as an adult, and also if I’d like it more. (Respectively, sort of and no.)
Maggie has two habits which make sense under the circumstances, but which did not endear her to me. One was her method of pre-emptively making people hate her, which was to be as mean and obnoxious as possible. The other is a mental game in which she explains ordinary things to the imaginary “Backwoods Girls,” who have never heard of anything, while she calls them stupid. This is present throughout the book, and goes on and on and ON for page after page after page. It was beyond tedious.
Her aunts are plain terrible. Her uncle is clearly supposed to be endearing, but he speaks entirely in unfunny whimsical jokes and flights of fancy, and literally never says anything normal ever, not even when it’s clear that his “humor” is confusing and upsetting Maggie.
The living dolls are in an extremely Uncanny Valley in that I think they’re supposed to be slightly creepy but mostly lovable, but came across to me as mostly creepy but not in a scary or fun/scary way. They’re dolls possessed or animated by the spirits of Maggie’s ancestors who died in a fire, and sit drinking imaginary tea and reading the newspaper headline about their death without ever understanding that’s what it is, and having the same conversations over and over and over. This afterlife seems more subtly horrific than sweet to me, especially as the way they keep looping through the same conversations and not remembering things is unintentionally reminiscient of dementia. Or maybe that is intentional, who knows.
Maggie gets angry and smashes the dolls around, cracking the male doll’s head and knocking off the dog’s ear and detaching the woman doll’s leg. She fixes them later, but damaging inanimate but sentient things, especially if they feel pain as these dolls do, is a huge squick/creep-out for me and did not endear her to me.
I like a lot of stuff that’s dark in some way or another, whether it’s scary horror or just deals with dark topics, but this book just felt unpleasant and unenjoyable.
Spoilers!
I read some reviews that said that the dolls are imaginary and Maggie is just creative and/or hallucinating. I don’t think this is supported by the text, as she learns things from the dolls that she only confirms later, and obtains items from the dolls that are from the past. Still, it is the sort of book where that reading isn’t totally out of the blue. She does hear the dolls as voices no one else can hear long before she finds them.
There is never any explanation of why her ancestors and their dog are now dolls, whether they’re animating pre-existing dolls or were literally transformed into dolls, or if everyone in the family becomes dolls after death or if it’s just them.
The dolls revert to being inanimate when Maggie is caught by her aunts with them. They only come alive again when the uncle dies and Maggie is about to be sent away again. The ending very clearly implies that the uncle is about to join them as a doll himself. This is played as heartwarming but I found it creepy. Though I have to say, he and his inability to have a sane conversation ever would fit right in!
When I was a kid, I thought probably the uncle had become a doll, but I wasn’t completely sure as you don’t actually see this and it’s not explicitly stated. Reading it now, it’s clear that he definitely becomes a doll.
So, when Maggie dies, will she too join the dolls in the attic? EEK!
Did any of you read this book? Did you like it better than I did? It’s widely beloved and won lots of awards, but appears to be currently out of print.
Behind the Attic Wall
From:
no subject
I can remember that I read the book, because the living china dog was vivid to me, but nothing else about it. The mental space occupied by reading it seems to have been taken up by other doll books like Rumer Godden's The Dolls' House (1947).
From:
no subject
Are dolls the children's book equivalent of dogs?
I like The Doll's House a lot better too.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I bet it's just as weird as you remembered.
From:
no subject
And that's how I learned that celluloid is flammable!
(I can't actually be sure of that, but I do think it was the first piece of fiction I read where it's a plot point.)
Are dolls the children's book equivalent of dogs?
I feel like dogs are more tear-jerking death, less uncanny valley. Dolls are almost always uncanny valley. I don't necessarily recommend re-reading Lynne Reid Banks' The Indian in the Cupboard (1980)—I tried a few years ago—but that's another book with a nightmare fuel premise presented as charming fantastical conceit (which, as I recall, gets increasingly WTF as the series goes on).
From:
no subject
I am definitely staying away from The Indian in the Cupboard but am now tempted by skygiants' there is nonetheless a part of me that does want to reread the extremely weird fourth book, where it turns out the cupboard was created by a ... troubled grandfather or great-uncle or something ...? ... who developed a vehement antipathy towards plastic.
From:
no subject
I know! I never actually track it down, but every time I am reminded of the existence of the series, I think about it.
(Please, if you do read it, report back.)
From:
no subject
Doesn't the ending include an older Maggie telling this story to some other little girls? Foster siblings or something? Or am I not remembering it correctly?
From:
no subject
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who was very confused by the ending!
From:
no subject
Did you know that she wrote several volumes of Harry the Poisonous Centipede, including Harry the Poisonous Centipede Goes to Sea?
From:
no subject
NO.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Uh, I guess rot-13 for spoilers:
Fb zl pbagragvba vf gung gur hapyr XABJF ur vf tbvat gb orpbzr n qbyy -- be znlor rira pubbfrf gb orpbzr n qbyy?? V erzrzore ur npghnyyl fnlf fbzrguvat yvxr, "V jvyy oevat gurz onpx" evtug orsber ur qvrf. V tbg gur qvfgvapg vzcerffvba (sebz gung) gung rvgure ur xarj ur jnf tbvat gb qvr -- be ur fcrpvsvpnyyl pubfr gb, va fbzr xvaq bs jnl (V xabj vg jnf fhccbfrq gb or n urneg nggnpx be fbzrguvat, ohg gung'f whfg jung gur nhagf fnvq, ubj jbhyq gurl xabj vs vg jnf jrveq qbyy zntvp??), va beqre gb oevat onpx gur bgure qbyyf.
Naq gura Znttvr yrsg naljnl. V gurersber pbagraq gung Znttvr vfa'g tbvat gb orpbzr n qbyy jura fur qvrf, hayrff fur tbrf onpx n ybg yngre naq npghnyyl jnagf gb.
...Guvf vf znxvat zr ernyvmvat ubj shyy bs ubyrf gung raqvat vf. Jul jnf vg fb vzcbegnag gung gur hapyr oevat gur qbyyf onpx, rfcrpvnyyl fvapr Znttvr jnf whfg tbvat gb yrnir naljnl naq yrnir gurz nybar?? (Hayrff ur whfg xarj ur jnf tbvat gb orpbzr n qbyy, jvgubhg univat n pubvpr va vg -- ohg ur qvqa'g frrz fpnerq nobhg vg ng nyy naq V guvax V'q or cerggl fpnerq vs V xarj zl nsgreyvsr vaibyirq orpbzvat n qbyy.) Vs vg unq orra jevggra gra lrnef yngre vg jbhyq cebonoyl unir orra bar bs gubfr obbxf jurer gur hapyr naq/be Znttvr eryrnfrf gur qbyyf sebz gurve greevoyr nsgreyvsr, uru.
...I remember a lot about the book's ending for how long ago that was. It definitely made an impact on me!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Yeah, the ending was what made it memorable for me too, as I was so baffled by it!
I think you're right that the uncle knew/wanted to be a doll. (HOW?) What a weird book.
I also read Ballet Shoes at around the same time and also liked it way more. Petrova was my favorite.
From:
no subject
(As a kid, I loved the idea of being able to turn my vast collection of plastic horses into real tiny ponies. I vaguely recall being aggrieved that the kid in the book didn’t take the obvious step of trying model dinosaurs in the cupboard)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Thank you for re-reading this so I never have to! I had always sort of wondered if it would make more sense if I ever came across it again as an adult, but it doesn't sound like it.
From:
no subject
Oh, yes, I also loved the idea of teeny real ponies (and still do.) And yes! There should have been wee rampaging dinosaurs! I must remedy that.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
LOL. So true.
Well, we now know that the dead uncle is definitely a doll at the end!
From:
no subject
Yaaaaaaaaaaay.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Yes, although I expressed it with remarkable incoherence.