Does a CV intended to be used to apply to teach at a college level really have to be around twenty pages long?
I am coming to the horrible realization that it is going to take forever to dig up the records I need to put this damn thing together.
I hope that my really quite good professional credentials will make up for my lack of actual teaching experience here. Though everyone I've ever taught or critiqued has seemed happy with the results, I've only ever taught at one workshop, critiqued privately, and guest-lectured for one college class session and two high school sessions.
...yeah, I need to make more money. Also, I enjoy teaching.
I am coming to the horrible realization that it is going to take forever to dig up the records I need to put this damn thing together.
I hope that my really quite good professional credentials will make up for my lack of actual teaching experience here. Though everyone I've ever taught or critiqued has seemed happy with the results, I've only ever taught at one workshop, critiqued privately, and guest-lectured for one college class session and two high school sessions.
...yeah, I need to make more money. Also, I enjoy teaching.
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I just double-checked with P. He is willing to forward his, but he hasn't updated it in 12 years or so, and it's 45 pages long, because of all the committees he's been on and his publications.
He says, here's what's on it:
Educational data, including honors and awards as well as degrees. That would include any special programs one completed.
Service to the academy and community--so committees you've sat on, public service of any kind (you've got an awesome cred next week!), even stuff like Nebula Jury and the like. You could include organizing LiveLongnMarry, for example, as co-chair.
Academic and related publications.
Teaching experience.
From:
no subject
Can you ask him this, though: my pro experience is much more impressive than my teaching experience. Which should I put first?
Also, do I need to put in details about all the college classes I took? And if so, should it go after after my teaching experience and before my pro experience, or after both?
From:
no subject
Needed>
Name/address, NO birthday or age.
Education Data (degrees, where, if graduated with honors. Nothing about classes.)
Awards. "Winner of Snack P, Globue Screenwriting Award," or "Winner of Senior Playwriting Competition" Production of Winning Play, "title' type of thing. If you were picked for a prestigious scholarship, put that.
Then publications and productions
Teaching Experience
Community Service
---------------in that order
From:
no subject
If he doesn't mind, I'd like to bring by the CV I've worked up for him to take a quick look at the next time I come by. (No in-depth analysis, required, just a glance to see if I'd made any awful mistakes.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I imagine it depends on the position you're applying for, though I can't imagine anyone would require a CV that long. All of the academic resumes I've seen (and I'm going on the job market in the fall, so I've seen quite a few) are closer to three or four.
From:
no subject
Would you mind emailing me a sample one, if you have one on hand? Preferably someone who's published stuff? Or yours, if you've put yours together already.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
The important thing is that you list everything relevant, and organize the information well. I've certainly gotten twenty-page CV's to read while we were hiring, but people who just indiscriminately list everything they've ever published, down to the last Usenet rant, aren't really doing themselves any favors. If I have to work to locate the last publiation in a reputable journal, I'm likely to decide that it's not worth my time.
Make sure that your education and employment history are clear and easy to follow, and sort publications in a way that makes it easy to tell what's really important-- for example, in science you would usually divide them up as "Journal Articles," "Invited Talks" and "Contributed Talks," from most to least significant. Lumping them all together (which I've seen done) just looks like padding.
From:
no subject