The opening page of Holland's thriller Grenelle is so bad in so many different ways that I feel compelled to quote the entire thing:

The scandal, a typhoon in a thimble, broke one windy autumn morning and caused, at the beginning, and before anyone connected it with that sad, unexplained death, far more raucous and ribald amusement than it did concern.

"Who the hell does he think would want the damn thing?" Father Spaeth roared at me, trying to control his cloak, which was whipping around his jeans like a sail in the fresh breeze blowing east across this part of Virginia from the Blue Ridge Mountains. "He must think he's back in the days when a lost relic would call out the armies of the Pope and the Emperor to wrest it away from the unbeliever. Christ!"

The father, who fancied himself as being, as he put it, a very Now priest, brought out the last word with emphasis, as though, I couldn't help thinking, he had laid a particularly challenging egg.


Susan Grenelle is the daughter of the dead dean of an undistinguished religious college recently shaken by an old priest's controversial claim to possess a splinter of the True Cross. It is an example of the clumsy craftsmanship of this book, so much less fun than Holland's Trelawny, Tower Abbey, or leprous Dracourt, that not only did I get through the entire book without knowing what Susan did for a living, but the origin of the cross fragment, earlier a huge source of mystery, was never revealed. I am also still not sure why the "sad, unexplained death" (the murder of a local boy) happened.

The Now Father Spaeth is spearheading Resist Relics (anti-splinter), against the more traditional pro-splinter faction. The splinter is stolen, then plastic imitations are hidden around the school. The dean's office is trashed. "Obscene, blasphemous" notes are sent (but sadly not quoted.) A group of drugged-out, criminal, Satanic and pagan hippies show up, drug Susan's niece Samantha's dog, kidnap Samantha, and lay her out for a ritual Satanic sacrifice in front of the real splinter.

There's also a romantic subplot about Susan and the former priest who jilted her in favor of her now-dead evil twin sister (now conveniently the local police chief-- the former fiancee, not the dead sister). In a desperate attempt to tie the way more interesting past family drama into the lame current cross shenanigans, the chief villain is revealed to be responsible for the deaths of Susan's father, sister, and sister's husband by hooking them all on drugs. He is also a psychotic Satanist.

Overall, this novel confirmed my theory that no book containing Satanists has ever been good.

Not one of Holland's better efforts.


From: [identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com


I think the book would be much more interesting if the dead sister was the police chief.

Somebody should write that.

From: [identity profile] tharain.livejournal.com


The scandal, a typhoon in a thimble, broke one windy autumn morning and caused, at the beginning, and before anyone connected it with that sad, unexplained death, far more raucous and ribald amusement than it did concern.

QUICK! QUICK! Enter that puppy in Bulwer Lytton!

From: [identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com


I know. I read that first sentence and winced. Geeze, did I write that in a past life? Of course, commas are not needed for confusion. Consider these two sentences:

Police police police police police police.

The mouse the cat the dog the jester the queen liked petted chased bit died.

From: [identity profile] spectralbovine.livejournal.com


Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

The mouse the cat the dog the jester the queen liked petted chased bit died.
That is brilliantly recursive. I love it.

From: [identity profile] thomasyan.livejournal.com


That's a good one. I can't parse your Buffalo sentence.

That is brilliantly recursive. I love it.

Apparently that kind of "stacking" is called center embedding and is generally hard for people to understand. It is probably a good thing I don't want kids, because I'm really curious whether if, exposed to deep center embedding from birth, kids would learn to deal with it.

Of course, if they did, they could then use it to confuse/confound/bypass adults. (Like using very high-pitched ringtones that adults cannot hear for their cellphone rings.)

From: [identity profile] spectralbovine.livejournal.com


That's a good one. I can't parse your Buffalo sentence.
Oh, that's a famous one! It has its own Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo).

Also fun is this one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_while_John_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_a_better_effect_on_the_teacher), although it needs punctuation to make sense.

It is probably a good thing I don't want kids, because I'm really curious whether if, exposed to deep center embedding from birth, kids would learn to deal with it.
Ha!

From: [identity profile] lady-ganesh.livejournal.com


How did you make it all the way through? I admire your persistence.
ext_3152: Cartoon face of badgerbag with her tongue sticking out and little lines of excitedness radiating. (Default)

From: [identity profile] badgerbag.livejournal.com


Sheer awesome badness! I started laughing on line one when "broke" and "wind" occurred a little too close to each other...

From: [identity profile] elfiepike.livejournal.com


Overall, this novel confirmed my theory that no book containing Satanists has ever been good.

Good Omens? or does it not count because the satanists are not main characters?

From: [identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com


Perhaps I should correct it to, "No book not intended to be a comedy which contains Satanists has ever been good."

From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com


The Monk has Satanists in it! and it is THE.BEST.BOOK.EVER.

Well. ....I assume it has Satanists in it. It certainly has EVERYTHING ELSE. Yes I think the Satanists are evil nuns....

From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com


The scandal, a typhoon in a thimble, broke one windy autumn morning and caused, at the beginning, and before anyone connected it with that sad, unexplained death, far more raucous and ribald amusement than it did concern.

Wait. Wha?

....so the scandal at the beginning before anyone connected it with that sad unexplained death far more raucous and wha.

WHAT.

A group of drugged-out, criminal, Satanic and pagan hippies show up, drug Susan's niece Samantha's dog, kidnap Samantha, and lay her out for a ritual Satanic sacrifice in front of the real splinter.

//cries

From: [identity profile] minnow1212.livejournal.com


:blinks: Wow, I'm fairly sure I've read some Isabella Holland, and I don't remember anything like *that.*
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)

From: [personal profile] oyceter


I wonder if manga can break the Satanists = bad book rule? Though I guess the existence of Cross is more proof of your theory!

From: [identity profile] rushthatspeaks.livejournal.com


Huh. I mean, eventual Satanists in Vassalord are inevitable, but I'm not sure that's good so much as awesome.
seajules: (Uh what?)

From: [personal profile] seajules


...Can I get a, "HUH?" from the audience?

From: [identity profile] homasse.livejournal.com


My brain started twitching and pulling out a big REJECT stamp at the first sentence; how did you get through all of it?!
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags