I am participating in
50books_poc, a challenge to read and review 50 books by people of color in a year. Read a book, write a post, post it to the community and, if you like, to your LJ too.
Any books count, including comics. However, I am choosing not to include manga, manhwa, or manhua in my totals. This is not because they are not written by POC, or because I think comics don't count as real books. It's because in my mind, the point of the challenge is to read and review books that you might not otherwise read and review. I already read and review a lot of manga, and already eagerly look for manhwa and manhua to read and review. Since I'm already doing that, it's not a challenge.
For me, this challenge is as much about reviewing as it is reading. I would guess that I do read 50 books by people of color per year. But my posting skews toward works that I think will get discussed, which skews it toward sf and fantasy, which are notoriously white genres.
This is the vicious circle: Most writers in the genre are white. Authors of color look at this and decide, with perfect justification, to write in a genre that has more people like them already in it. The genre continues to be white. Fans of color are unwelcome and excluded. They go elsewhere.
The even-more-predominantly-white fans and publishers unconsciously or consciously select within their cultural comfort zones, choosing books about white people and portraying characters of color as white on the book covers. More fans of color go away. Publishers decide, unconsciously or consciously, that clearly, what sells is whitey whitey whiteness. They print more of that.
All fans remaining are now reading many of the same books by white authors. If they want lots of discussion, they have to discuss those books. The discussions skews toward those books, giving them more publicity and the books by authors of color less. The latter books sell poorly, proving to the publishers what they already believe. And so the cycle continues.
This happens in other genres as well. It's just especially obvious and disgraceful in sf.
I am doing this challenge because, to crib from my reply to a commenter on
meganbmoore's LJ:
"In America, publishers publish more white writers and bookshops carry more white writers, and so it is harder to find and read books by authors of color without making a special effort. So making that distinction in order to read more authors of color both broadens readers' horizons, and provides royalties and publicity to authors of color.
There's also the phenomenon in which white writers writing about POC frequently get more sales, publicity, etc than authors of color writing about POC. Good explanation of that here: http://jonquil.livejournal.com/799057.html
Basically, especially if you're white, if you don't make the distinction, you will end up primarily or entirely reading books by white authors. In that case, the distinction you don't make gets made for you by the way that society works. And I'm sure you don't agree that reading only books by white authors is the ideal state of the world."
Plus, I think it will be fun!
I invite you all to join this challenge with me. Please comment to let me know if you decide to do so.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Any books count, including comics. However, I am choosing not to include manga, manhwa, or manhua in my totals. This is not because they are not written by POC, or because I think comics don't count as real books. It's because in my mind, the point of the challenge is to read and review books that you might not otherwise read and review. I already read and review a lot of manga, and already eagerly look for manhwa and manhua to read and review. Since I'm already doing that, it's not a challenge.
For me, this challenge is as much about reviewing as it is reading. I would guess that I do read 50 books by people of color per year. But my posting skews toward works that I think will get discussed, which skews it toward sf and fantasy, which are notoriously white genres.
This is the vicious circle: Most writers in the genre are white. Authors of color look at this and decide, with perfect justification, to write in a genre that has more people like them already in it. The genre continues to be white. Fans of color are unwelcome and excluded. They go elsewhere.
The even-more-predominantly-white fans and publishers unconsciously or consciously select within their cultural comfort zones, choosing books about white people and portraying characters of color as white on the book covers. More fans of color go away. Publishers decide, unconsciously or consciously, that clearly, what sells is whitey whitey whiteness. They print more of that.
All fans remaining are now reading many of the same books by white authors. If they want lots of discussion, they have to discuss those books. The discussions skews toward those books, giving them more publicity and the books by authors of color less. The latter books sell poorly, proving to the publishers what they already believe. And so the cycle continues.
This happens in other genres as well. It's just especially obvious and disgraceful in sf.
I am doing this challenge because, to crib from my reply to a commenter on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"In America, publishers publish more white writers and bookshops carry more white writers, and so it is harder to find and read books by authors of color without making a special effort. So making that distinction in order to read more authors of color both broadens readers' horizons, and provides royalties and publicity to authors of color.
There's also the phenomenon in which white writers writing about POC frequently get more sales, publicity, etc than authors of color writing about POC. Good explanation of that here: http://jonquil.livejournal.com/799057.html
Basically, especially if you're white, if you don't make the distinction, you will end up primarily or entirely reading books by white authors. In that case, the distinction you don't make gets made for you by the way that society works. And I'm sure you don't agree that reading only books by white authors is the ideal state of the world."
Plus, I think it will be fun!
I invite you all to join this challenge with me. Please comment to let me know if you decide to do so.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Caveat: My too-read stack is pretty high, so no guarantees on how fast I'll get to it.
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I joined the community a week or two ago and ought to be posting about my first book (Nalo Hopkinson's amazing The Salt Roads) any day now.
From:
no subject
I guess I'll start at Amazon :)
From:
no subject
Recs skewed toward strong female characters and a "fun read" style: http://community.livejournal.com/50books_poc/58797.html
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Heck, for that matter, I am not sure how many books by PoC I have read in my entire life.
So just posting 50 reviews (or reviewlets) would be a major accomplishment for me. Hm, maybe I should try tallying things up.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I feel a jaunt to the library coming on...and thanks, btw, for your review of Graceling, which looks like the perfect place to start.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
May I do a modified version of this? I would like to be reading a little more nonfiction about religious Others and non-Western histories. (I sort of regret now that I ditched that book about non-Western warfare, but good sweet gravy it was dry.--Author's fault, not topic's.) I don't think I can realistically commit to 50 (for a lot of the reasons listed above)--but I can commit to something > 0.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
* It has one of the biggest frustrations of life-after-the-car accident that I ended up with what some doctors call "Post-Concussive Syndrome" (and some doctors don't believe exists) which among other things makes my brain go through phases where reading for pleasure and even sometimes just for comprehension just isn't in the spoons, or the neurons won't fire correctly, or something. So I'll have to be more much flexible with my books-to-timeframe ratio -- I've been averaging less than 5 books a year most years since then, but I've been wanting to find ways to increase that anyway.
From:
no subject
I certainly don't want to be all doctrinaire as to how many books "count!" But FYI, tomorrow I'll be posting a review of a very short and very beautiful novel by African-American YA novelist Angela Johnson. (I mention in case shorter is easier.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I did my 50 (and more) last year, and found that the "hit rate" (the proportion of books I really enjoyed) was notably higher than in my previous "regular" reading (without making a conscious effort to read diversely).
In fact, I discovered a number of authors who are now among my all-time favourites (e.g. Colson Whitehead and Bernardine Evaristo), and I know that if it hadn't been for the nudge of
(Which was a shock, because I thought that I'd already been reading fairly diversely. Apparently I could have been doing a lot better.)
Now I've started working on racking up at least 50 more this year, and it's thoroughly selfish: this way I get more good reading.
From:
no subject
2 POC Challenge books: Both excellent.
1 Random White Guy book: OMG awful.
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Thank you!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I would love to hear about the Chinese books, and they definitely fit the parameters of the challenge as laid out in the