As someone said, the internet's oldest established permanent floating flame war has started up again ("Just like the Greeks thought that they'd successfully put Hector down and that no one would survive to avenge him, so the establishment thought it had successfully put Heinlein down and no one would survive to avenge him,") reminding me of how much I enjoyed Heinlein's juveniles when I was twelve, though even then I had a taste for the odd, the dated, and the, shall we say, differently good.
I vividly recall reading Heinlein's rant in Have Space Suit Will Travel about how anyone who can't use a slide rule is a moron, and having to figure out from context that he was referring to an obsolete calculating device. That was by far the most sf-nal moment for me reading that book - a visceral sense that I was living in someone's future, and things had changed.
I'm now curious to re-read some of what I read when I was twelve and see how it holds up and doesn't.
Note: I refuse to re-read any Heinlein novels not listed, on the grounds that even at twelve, I was unable to read any of the late ones containing orgies, fanfic, grokking, "Sorry about the rape, Friday," etc, and I would probably find them even more unreadable now. I have never read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, but I hear it's more readable than most of his adult novels...?
[Poll #1607634]
I vividly recall reading Heinlein's rant in Have Space Suit Will Travel about how anyone who can't use a slide rule is a moron, and having to figure out from context that he was referring to an obsolete calculating device. That was by far the most sf-nal moment for me reading that book - a visceral sense that I was living in someone's future, and things had changed.
I'm now curious to re-read some of what I read when I was twelve and see how it holds up and doesn't.
Note: I refuse to re-read any Heinlein novels not listed, on the grounds that even at twelve, I was unable to read any of the late ones containing orgies, fanfic, grokking, "Sorry about the rape, Friday," etc, and I would probably find them even more unreadable now. I have never read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, but I hear it's more readable than most of his adult novels...?
[Poll #1607634]
From:
no subject
like, wow. really?
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Podkayne of Mars is my favorite of Heinlein's juveniles, though it's hard to read in some places through fifty years of social change.
I'd also suggest "I, Robot" as a good example of the future that turned out substantially different than expected.
From:
no subject
So screamingly hateful.
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I am deeply impressed by her prolificacy.
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
The Door Into Summer is loving and tender. I loved Glory Road a lot, and the female protagonist, Star, has oodles of agency and motives of her own.
Door into Summer if you want science fiction, Glory Road if you want good old fashioned swords n' monsters n' stars adventure.
From:
no subject
Well... yes. But it does still involve a grown man planning to marry a 12(?)-year old when she grows up.
Of course, since I still like The Witches of Karres, possibly I should shut up now.
Actually, Karres would be a good thing to read, Rachel, if you haven't already. It depends almost entirely on tone, so if you don't like the tone you'll hate it, but you might like it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
...I think I need to turn in my degree now.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Here is what I would recommend as a short course in Heinlein. It slightly violates your rules, but I am hoping for forgiveness:
As for other things on your list... Harsh Mistress is certainly decent but you can see signs of his later problems starting to appear. Glory Road is something of a curate's egg: it has a lot of sexism, but also has an interesting scene where the main female character points out to the protagonist how many Earthly customs are predicated on the assumption that female sexuality is a commodity. The ending is interesting, too.
I've read very little Norton so can't recommend anything there.
For Asimov's fiction, I'd recommend the collection I, Robot, The Caves of Steel, or his non-SF mystery Murder at the ABA, if you can stomach the thought of a protagonist based on Harlan Ellison (or rather, Asimov's perception of Harlan Ellison). I have to note here that whatever you think of Heinlein's writing chops, Asimov's weren't as good, at least for fiction.
From:
no subject
Actually, the idea of a protagonist based on Asimov's perception of Harlan Ellison sounds hilarious. Plus I've already read two books which contain fictionalized Harlan Ellison, Ben Bova's The Star-Crossed, in which he's the hero, and (I suspect) the short, obnoxious author who gets murdered at a sf convention in Sharyn McCrumb's Bimbos of the Death Sun.
(If the latter sounds fun, it kind of is, but also conveys the strong message that all sf fans are fat losers, except for the few who are smart, thin, pretty, and dabble a teeny bit in sf while understanding that it's a mere hobby, unlike the serious interest of the sad fools scurrying below.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
But I would love to see you review some Norton. Which one, which one? Year of the Unicorn, perhaps, which is a retelling of Beauty & the Beast in the Witchworld universe. Or Moon of Three Rings, one of her few space operas with a female cast member.
(If I were on DW, I would use my Andre Norton icon.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I remember reading somewhere (the foreword, maybe?) that Heinlein had put so much thought into his futures, but there were still a lot of little anachronisms, like the slide rule, or the fact that nobody wore pantyhose (they still wore stockings). It's the past-future, like watching old 50s and 60s sci-fi movies.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
Andre Norton! Oh, so much love. Much of Norton has not dated, though I would not start the Witch World books with Witch World. My favorite Nortons are Year of the Unicorn, which is a great fantasy novel and a great romance; Wheel of Stars, which is an enjoyably and genuinely creepy horror-fantasy centered around an awesomely preposterous central concept; Galactic Derelict, which has some of her best travelogue; and Moon Called, which just seems to be what I want in that sort of fantasy novel. The High Hallack thread of the Witch World books starts with Year of the Unicorn and honestly I wouldn't read the Gryphon books (The Crystal Gryphon, The Jargoon Pard, I may be missing one) without having read that one, but you don't have to read any of the other Witch World threads for the High Hallack books to make sense.
Ninety percent of Asimov has dated horribly. I went through a revisiting-my-childhood phase last year and I found E.E. Smith far more readable, which says something. If you must, the short robot stories are still pretty fun, though the sexism fairy hit some of them Very Hard Indeed; and The Caves of Steel has actually dated in ways that help it because it is now possible to see its sexism issues as part of its dystopian setting.
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
And if you're really in a back-in-the-day mood, I would be fascinated to see what an adult reader coming to E.E. Smith nowadays would think. I read them when I was very small and so I have no ability to tell whether anyone can still get anything out of them at all. The place to start with the Lensman books would be Galactic Patrol and the place to start with the Skylark books would be The Skylark of Space.
From:
no subject
I found that purely by chance and loved it.
I wonder what I'd think of it now.
From:
no subject
A Mirror for Observers by Edgar Pangborn sounds like the kind of book I might have read at age 12, might still like to, but never have. It's the highest-ranked at http://classics.jameswallaceharris.com/ByRank.php I could say that of.
From:
no subject
The Rolling Stones is pretty much my favorite Heinlein juvenile. It's chronologically something of a sequel to Moon, but it's a lot more fun as pure story. The shorts with female protagonists are also damn fun, and I find it deeply irritating that for the most part they were considered unpublishable on their own.
I bounced off Andre Norton quite hard as a kid, and have never managed to unbounce. I'm not really sure why... Marion Zimmer Bradley and Anne McCaffrey worked a lot better for me.
I dearly love Arthur C Clarke's Dolphin Island, despite it being hideously schlocky. I also haven't reread it since I was about 12 because IT IS SCHLOCK. (it's the first SF book I ever read... at something like age 7 or 8)
From:
no subject
(Starship Troopers, the only other book of his I read as an adult, is such low-hanging fruit of reviewer-savagery that I can hardly recommend it. Let's just say that, within the first 20 pages, Heinlein blames the near-collapse of human civilization on the fact that evil psychologists required all the stalwart parents of the world to stop beating their children. Yeeeah.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject