rachelmanija: Hunched-over black cat. Text: I suppose this could have gone better (Cats: I suppose this could have gone bet)
( Dec. 30th, 2019 10:57 am)
I’ve never seen the play Cats, but I know the concept and I’ve heard the songs. Halle and I rushed to see the movie before it vanished from theatres, on the theory that a CATastrophe like this may come but once in a lifetime.

Regrettably, we did not see the original version. We saw the one that was “fixed” so now all the cats have human hands. All the moments where they make gestures on the clear assumption that their hands will be CG’d into paws look incredibly bizarre. We saw it with a very small audience that did not react much, except when a small child ran madly out of the theatre with a parent in hot pursuit. Neither of them returned.

I brought a canned mango margarita, which was a good choice. I think weed would have been an even better one. This was a stoner movie if I ever saw one, a movie made for murmurs of “Whoa” and lengthy fits of hysterical laughter. And now that I have seen Rebel Wilson unzip her cat suit, step out wearing another cat suit which is wearing a bikini, display her tiny cabaret in which she forces slave mice with CG’d child faces to perform, and then bring out a parade of cockroaches which are chorus girls with CG roach wings wearing Star Trek swim caps with antennae attached, make them march upside down on the underside of a table, and then graphically crunch them between her teeth and eat them, I feel that I have no need to ever take LSD.

The story, such as it is, begins when a white spotted cat named Victoria gets abandoned in a sack and found by the Jellicle Cats. They explain that they all want to be taken to the Heaviside Layer, which is Heaven, but only one can be chosen. They audition by singing. That’s when Rebel Wilson unzips herself and a bunch of chorus dancing cockroaches spin around on a strawberry cake and also there’s a lot of fat jokes. Macavity (Idris Elba in a flasher coat and glowing CG green eyes) vaporizes her to get rid of the competition and she materializes on a ship in the middle of the Thames.

This scene repeats about six times: a cat sings, then Macavity vaporizes them and they materialize on his boat. No one seems at all bothered by this until he vaporizes Judi Dench. Judi Dench has CG cat fur AND a giant fur coat the same color as her cat fur, so it looks like she made a coat out of her own clone, Buffalo Bill-style. A cat rubs against her and it is so creepy.

A lot of the movie seemed weirdly sexual, especially since some cats wore clothes, which made the ones who didn’t seem naked and the ones who only wore shirts to seem to be naked from the waist down. Every time a clothed cat disrobes, which occurs frequently, it not only makes them seem naked, it makes all the cats seem naked.

Ian McKellen has perhaps the most bizarre performance in the entire movie. It starts with him assiduously licking a shelf and just goes on from there. He defeats the bad guy by shouting “Feefiddlefuzzle!” and I was still having hysterics ten minutes later.

The play is infamous for having virtually no plot and for what plot there is to be nonsensical. However, the same can be said about some ballets. If you’re basically there for singing and dancing, you don’t necessarily need a plot. Movies, however, typically do add plot when adapting plotless materials. It’s not inherently a problem that this movie doesn’t, but it makes zero effort to consider that what works onstage may not work onscreen.

The movie is full of random cuts to new locations, which were probably done onstage with set or light changes and worked fine, but in the movie feel like the characters teleported. It also uses the same location, a street corner, about a bazillion times for no reason. Onstage the reason is that it’s the main set; in a movie, there’s no clear reason and it seems weird.

Which, of course, is not even close to being the weirdest thing about this movie. Onstage, people wearing cat suits and cat makeup and dancing is at worst cheesy and at best fun. If they’d just done this for the movie, it would have been a huge improvement over what they actually did, which was to CG fur and cat parts on to actors in bodysuits. If you’ve seen photos, you can get some sense of just how Uncanny Valley this is, but having it in motion makes it so much worse. There’s a grey cat who introduces a bunch of cats, and every time he turned around so you get a look at his pasted-on-yay face head-on, I recoiled back into my seat.

The tails are CG animated and move like dancing cobras, not cat tails. At one point Rebel Wilson uses a tail as a microphone and you can still see her own tail and there is no other cat nearby.

The scale is completely inconsistent, even within the same scene. The cats are as tall as garbage cans, then they fall into one and suddenly five of them can easily fit inside and a champagne bottle is as long as they are. The prop food is very clearly fake, but fake like a bad attempt at realism, not cartoon-like.

Every time the actors drop down on all fours and scuttle around, the effect is less graceful and cool than horrifying. It looks exactly like every horror movie ever where people crawl toward you because they’re possessed and then their heads spin around or they lift their heads and you see that their eyes are upside down or made of teeth. It doesn’t help that there’s a scene where all the cats get possessed by the moon or something and fall down and then act post-coital, like they had a giant orgy with the cat devil on the astral plane.

At some point, to indicate that Magic is Happening, gravity turns off and everything floats around for a while.

Jennifer Hudson plays Grizabella, an aging cat prostitute who is now a bag lady. She has shiny lines of snot below each nostril for the entire movie. Since her whole face was CG’d, someone made a conscious decision to put that snot in and make sure it’s there consistently and has just the right gleam.

Except for “Mungojerrie and Rumpleteaser,” which was surprisingly actually good, the songs were all pretty bad versions of them. The sound mixing was off in “Memory,” so you couldn’t understand most of the words. There were clearly good dancers in the cast, but it’s not directed so you can appreciate it or even see it well. Except for some excellent tap dancing. Only the actor looked almost totally human including his tap shoes, so it was basically a tap dancing sequence by a dude in a giant cat head. For the record, this was where Halle completely lost it.

I almost forgot to mention that Taylor Swift shows up randomly and noncon drugs all the cats with glowing catnip that is clearly meant to be cocaine. She has breasts, unlike the other cats. At this point Idris Elba throws off his flasher coat and is clearly naked beneath it, with visible human muscles. So if you’ve ever wanted to see Taylor Swift and Idris Elba dance naked in fur suits, this is your chance.

At some point after this, Jennifer Hudson ascends to Heaven in a chandelier attached to a hot air balloon. Hopefully Heaven has Kleenex.

And then Dami Judi Dench stares directly into the camera and forcefully informs us that cats are not dogs while holding her human hand, which bears a wedding ring, over her heart. The camera focuses on her mouth and it is very noticeable that her teeth look terrible.

Me (whispers): “Do you think they fix up her teeth for all her other movies?”

Halle (whispers): “Maybe they deliberately made her teeth look like that for this one.”

Me: “Why would they do that?”

Halle: “Why would they do anything in this movie?”

The camera then goes lower, so we can see that they have CG’d giant wads of orange fur to her very human bare feet so they look like Bigfoot feet.

And with that, the movie unceremoniously ends.

I looked up Dame Judi’s teeth afterward. They look fine in photos. So either something went horribly wrong with makeup, CG, or lighting and nobody noticed or fixed it, or else someone decided she really needed to look like she had decayed and missing teeth to go with her Bigfoot feet. I don’t understand how either scenario could occur, but as Halle pointed out, “Why would they do anything in this movie?”

A chapter book from 1966. I had assumed the title meant “Project: Cat,” as in the kids have made it their project to acquire a cat. In fact, it’s “Project Cat,” as in cat in a housing project.

The housing project the kids live in doesn’t allow pets, so when they find a pregnant stray cat, they care for it and feed it outside, all the while trying to hide it from anyone who might do it harm or shoo it away. The cat is a pretty realistic scared stray cat, but the story comes to a less realistic but delightful conclusion.

Read more... )

The story is simple but sweet, and the illustrations are very cute. I looked up the illustrator, partly because of his remarkable name, and discovered that he wrote The East End Years: A Stepney Childhood, which is described thus at Goodreads:

Fermin Rocker was born in the East End of London in 1907, the son of Rudolf Rocker, the famous anarchist theorist, activist and disciple of Kropotkin. A book illustrator, and painter, in exploring his origins as an artist, Fermin conjures a moving and colorful picture of his remarkable father, of Anarchism and of the Jewish East End. Heavily illustrated by the author.

BOUGHT.

Project Cat



The East End Years: A Stepney Childhood

This is a re-read. I’ve read this book multiple times. It’s one of Le Guin’s earliest works, novella-length and an expansion/continuation of a haunting short story, “Semley’s Necklace,” which is a science fiction version of a very ancient folkloric theme, the human visitor to Faerie who returns to find that during their brief sojourn, years have passed, their spouse is old or dead, and their children have grown. In Le Guin’s version, Faerie is another world and the time change is due to faster than light travel.

Rocannon is a scientist who gets stranded on a less technologically advanced world; there’s a loose plot involving him trying to communicate with his people on his own world and getting involved in a war on the world he’s on, but it’s mostly a picaresque about exploring a new world. The plot is not the point. (Nor is Rocannon himself, who is a blank slate and really exists as a body for the reader to inhabit.) The point is a series of beautiful or terrifying or strange encounters: the windsteeds, which are giant cats with wings; the city of angels and its shift from awe to horror as Rocannon realizes that beauty does not mean intelligence; the small furry creatures that rescue and guide him; his ordeal by fire, with echoes of the phoenix and Odin upon the tree. It doesn’t hang together particularly well as a smooth, continuous narrative, but then again, the picaresque is a perfectly legitimate form that just happens to not be much respected now.

Rocannon’s World is one of those books whose flaws are what make it wonderful. Le Guin has written about how it was written while she was still finding her voice and working out the rules of her universe; she points out that Rocannon’s impermasuit, which protects him from physical harm, was a clunky attempt to transfer magical armor into a science fiction setting, and ought to have suffocated him. No such thing exists in her later books. She’s correct that it is something of an awkward marriage between myth and science, and yet it creates the stunning scene in which he’s captured and burned alive, forced to stand unharmed but helpless within the flames, and finally emerges from the ashes, takes off the suit which, once off his body, appears to be nothing more than a handful of plastic and wires, and bathes naked in the river, trying to wash away the memory of flames licking at his eyes. How marvelous is that! We are lucky to have the book that Le Guin didn’t get quite right, that didn’t do what she wanted it to do. If it had been more perfect, it might well have ben less memorable.

This is the edition I have: Rocannon's World. I have to say, I really love that cover. What could possibly be better than a dude in a cape and armor, carrying a torch and riding a giant flying cat in a surprisingly practical-looking harness?
Magic in the Alley is a sweet, atmospheric children’s fantasy by the author of one of my very favorite children’s books, The House of Thirty Cats. The latter is about a girl who befriends an old lady with thirty cats, and ends up helping her match prospective cat owners with the exact right cat for them. It does a great job of sketching the personalities of a very large cast of cats and people, and, by paying close attention to the details of each passing moment, illuminates their beautiful, near-magical qualities. Calhoun is no Banana Yoshimoto, but she’s clearly interested in some similar emotional territory. The House of Thirty Cats is out of print, but cheap used copies are easy to find.

In Magic in the Alley, Cleery finds a box of magic in a thrift store. Her first wish is to bring a stuffed crow to life; her second is that for the whole summer, every time she walks down a new alley, she’ll find something enchanted. The stuffed crow’s wings don’t work, and his increasingly desperate desire to fly again drives the plot and the moving conclusion. It’s a standard plot, but well-done, imaginative, and psychologically perceptive. The details of the magic are lovely: a tiny but fierce mermaid, a garden where the characters’ love of their favorite season traps them in it, an invisibility cloak that infects the wearer with a sort of playful madness.

Unfortunately, this one is quite rare. I’ve never owned a copy, and had to get it from the library for a re-read.
Dan Davis, genius engineer, invents a household chore-doing robot (which I have to admit that I covet) but is screwed out of his patent by his partner and his double-crossing fiancée. Through a sequence of events too fun to spoil, he ends up in the future – and then back to the past, trying to fix things. And, alas, hit on an eleven-year-old. Sort of.

His evil partner’s eleven-year-old daughter Ricky has a massive crush on Dan – and, though he has never known her as an adult, he tells her that if she waits till she’s twenty-one, he’ll marry her then, even though he won't have any contact with her in between her being eleven and the day he marries her. And he does! I find this both squicky and weird. People change a lot between eleven and twenty-one.

There’s also a passage of jaw-dropping sexism in which Dan muses that he should never trust a woman after his fiancée screwed him over – but it’s okay to trust Ricky, because she hasn’t yet reached sexual maturity and so can’t manipulate him with her mind-warping femininity field! I honestly wonder what Heinlein (okay, or Dan) would have said if someone had said, “So, since your male business partner also screwed you, does that mean you should never trust a man?”

This book was one of my favorite Heinleins as a kid, but even then that made me grind my teeth in proto-feminist annoyance.

Reading the book now, I’m struck by the wit and style of some of the prose, which is quite unlike the transparent plainness of Tunnel in the Sky and Space Cadet (and, thank goodness, the icky-poo twee of Podkayne.) Have Space Suit – Will Travel had a similar sense of fun, but fewer wisecracks and memorable turns of phrase. Summer has something of the tone of a private eye novel, which makes sense as it involves a crime, a patsy, a no-good partner, and a double-crossing dame – and is set in that perennial haven for sardonic detectives, Los Angeles.

Other highlights include the ginger ale-drinking tomcat Pete (everyone’s favorite character, I’m sure) and a convincing portrayal of culture shock due to time displacement. The future is so carefully worked out that its datedness and wrong predictions become an aspect of its charm and an intriguing invitation to the reader to compare prediction to reality. This is a very fun book, if you can overlook the sexism and try not to think too hard about the romance.

My edition features a man in a cape and a ridiculous-looking helmet much like that of the X-Men’s Havok, but even less cool, clutching either a desk toy or a piece of modern art: Door Into Summer Signet D2443

In-print version, with strange-looking woman and an unhappy cat: The Door into Summer

Diane Duane’s The Door Into Fire, in which the damsel in distress is a man and so is his lover-rescuer, and the cat is a fire elemental and shapeshifter. I highly recommend it if you like sweet, tastefully sensual, comfort-reading fantasy, but am mostly linking so you can witness the utterly tasteless cover, featuring a writhing naked woman, a glowing phallic symbol, and a Knight Who Said Nii: The Door Into Fire (The Tale of the Five #1)
Princess, by Carolyn Lane.

I reviewed the sequel, Princess and Minerva, earlier. In this one, pampered housecat Princess is lost while her owners are on vacation, and spends a winter struggling to survive with the help of stray cat Minerva. I liked the unsentimental depiction of hunting and survival, and the poignance of Princess’s plight and, eventually, reunion with her owner. The ending is surprisingly melancholy. (Melancholy, not depressing; no cats die in this book, though many prey animals are devoured.)

Princess

To Have and To Hold, by Patricia Gaffney.

Well-written and well-characterized romance in which the hero is a total dick. And a rapist. And a dick. I think Gaffney was trying to take a standard romance trope—the rape/slave fantasy in which you have to sexually submit to the hero because he has some kind of hold over you— and apply psychological realism to it. I respect her ambition, but the result is a romance in which the hero is a dick.

To Have and To Hold (Victorian Trilogy)

The Sea of Trolls, by Nancy Farmer.

In this YA fantasy, Saxon boy Jack and his little sister Lucy are kidnapped by Vikings and, after a journey described in rather more realistically horrific detail than I expected, are sent on a quest to the land of the Jotuns (trolls.) I enjoyed this, especially once the grim “enslaved on a ship” first half was over. The second half is colorful and fun, and has a few nice surprises. I then read the two sequels, which were less coherent and less fun, but the first book comes to a reasonable conclusion and so you could reasonably stop there. My favorite character was Thorgil, a filthy, bad-tempered girl who wants to become a berserker and die gloriously. In the sequels she is less ferocious and more sane, and so less fun and more conventional.

My Horizontal Life: A Collection of One-Night Stands, by Chelsea Handler

Unreadable. I made it far in enough to note that there isn’t much actual sex, that it’s clearly fiction (maybe loosely based on fact) rather than the memoir it’s marketed as, and it’s so aggressively jokey that I felt as if the author was shrieking a comic monologue at me from six inches away. I can’t do better than this quote from the poor person at Publishers Weekly who had to read the whole thing:

“Anyone who laughs at the mere mention of vaginas and penises may find Handler's book almost as much fun as getting drunk and waking up in some stranger's bed.”

My Horizontal Life: A Collection of One-Night Stands
While I was in Taipei, I went to a used bookshop. In the two cases devoted to English-language books, I found a copy of this book, which I had not recalled since I last read it (when I was nine, probably) but which I recognized immediately from the cover photo.

Minerva, a feral calico cat, is buddies with Princess, a pampered Persian who visits when her family rents a beach house every summer. In the previous book (which I haven’t read) Princess is somehow accidentally left behind and learns to survive with Minerva’s help. In this one, Minerva is hit by a car and driven to a veterinary hospital, then given away to a woman who lives far from Minerva’s ocean-side home. Minerva escapes and evades various dangers and well-meaning attempted owners, on her quest to get back home and see Princess again.

Not a classic or anything, but nicely written, vivid, and sweet. I’ll nab the prequel the next time I have an Amazon order.

Princess and Minerva
Like many of Maxwell’s books, this is space opera from the id.

Sharia and Kane are psychics whose soul-bond is externalized and visible within the color-changing jewels they both wear. Sharia has silver skin and violet eyes and translucent silver hair. She can kill (and heal) people with her hair. Yes, literally. Kane has translucent black hair and can pick up psychometric impressions from objects. (Via his hands. I know, too bad.)

They Can Never Touch because they both have five fingers and five touching five is the ultimate taboo on their planet. When it turns out that there is an actual reason behind this, even more angst ensues. The plot, such as it is, is that Sharia and Kane’s home planet collectively went insane and the whole population became a ravening mob of crazed psychics when a pair of purple jewels that were the only thing preventing this were deactivated and then stolen. Kane and Sharia, in between touching, not touching, longing to touch, having various space yentas tell them they’ll go insane if they don’t touch, etc, search for the jewels.

And if that wasn’t enough, there are semi-sentient ships, ancient artifacts, space pirates, a translating machine that drives you insane, reincarnation, and an unkillable interdimensional transparent soul-eating cat companion.

There’s too much action occurring on the psychic plane for my taste, but it’s all great fun when people aren’t communing with or zapping each other in lengthy passages of abstract description. Kane and Sharia are sweet and rather more sensible than one would expect under the circumstances, considering all the psychic lunacy and epic angst floating about. I enjoyed this.

Timeshadow Rider
.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags