rachelmanija: (Default)
( Oct. 14th, 2013 11:39 am)
I had a lovely time at Sirens, and will try to get up a few more sets of panel notes. I hope that anyone who attended will also write panel notes, trip reports, etc.

I had a room with a gorgeous view of fields and trees and mountains and clouds caught on the mountain slopes, which I shared with Shveta Thakrar, K. Tempest Bradford, and Rosamond Hodge. Thanks to my roomies for making the whole experience even more awesome! I even got to snag an ARC of Rosamond's first novel, Cruel Beauty, which I am excited to read.

Probably my biggest "crossing the streams" experience was when I fangirled over Sara Empress of the World Ryan, and she said that she knew who I was. I assumed she'd either come across Yes Gay YA or my blog. Instead, she said, "You wrote "No Reservations: Narnia!""

Shveta and I did a presentation with slides and stories on the heroines of Indian comic books, and raffled off a comic, which was won by Joy Kim. It has a flying warrior with exploding feet on the cover.

There were great panels and discussions. In the guest of honor keynotes, Ellen Kushner sang traditional ballads, Alaya Dawn Johnson rhapsodized over hot springs, Robin LaFevers gave a fiery feminist speech, and Guadalupe Garcia McCall had the room alternating between howls of laughter and tears. (She also accidentally said "thirty sweaty balls," when she meant "thirty sweaty boys," which was definitely my favorite malaprop of the weekend.)

...and then my flight got delayed for five hours, and I caught a cold. But it's OK: I took the time to catch up on all my school reading. Why did I get stuck with all the psychoanalytic classes in my last quarter?

Gwyniera reports on the Georgette Heyer panel.

Sara Ryan reports on the whole experience.

The theme for next year is "hauntings." Who's coming?

I'm thinking of proposing panels on sex scenes in fantasy (probably not actually titled "I Tripped and Fell on his Dick") and portal fantasy (probably not actually titled "Surprisingly Controversial!"). If Guadalupe can come back, I'd also like to do something on fantasy/sf in the southwest.
From notes, so there may be errors. This was a really lively panel.

Kate Elliott (author): There’s a lot of discussion of the roles of women in epic fantasy.

Andrea Horbinski (academic): It’s the epic fantasy discussion that continues in perpetuity.

Kate: I saw one guy write, “99% of all women in history were illiterate peasants who were always pregnant and never went more than two miles from their village, so why write about them? They didn’t do anything.”

Robin LaFevers (author): YA gets a lot of crossover adult readers because women get to do more in it, and can play all the roles. Romance is another genre that’s more female-centered. About that “the average woman never did anything,” fantasy is either about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances, or about extraordinary people. The magnitude of the cop-out there is breathtaking.

Kate: [Defends ordinary lives.] I was on a panel once where I said, “We have novel after novel about war. Why none about childbirth?” A man on the panel said, “Because every battle is different, but every childbirth is the same?”

Robin: Is he still in possession of all his body parts?

Kate: Raising children can be a heroic choice. And not seeing it as such is also a choice.

Guadalupe Garcia McCall (author and teacher): I teach eighth graders at a 99% Hispanic school. The girls are caught up in romance and being pretty. I try to teach them that there’s other ways to be. I taught them about the women in the Mexican Revolution. They had guns. Some were pregnant. Some had their children with them. They were tough! Girls have the warrior instinct in them, in their culture.

Andrea: In the 1400s, Mexico City was the original cosmopolitan metropolis. A lot of fiction doesn’t express how different the past was.

Gillian Chisom (academic): Witchcraft confessions are some of the few extant narratives by illiterate women in that place and time. There’s one from 1570s Scotland, by a woman who had a fairy guide, a dead nobleman.

[“Early Snapewife,” I thought.]

Gillian: She’d just given birth, her husband was sick, and she had to drive the cows home. A fairy appeared to her and offered her an escape.

In the 1640s, England had its only mass witch hunt. It was led by one man, a witch finder. He asked one woman on trial to describe the Devil. She said he was a proper man, “like you.” He asked her if she’d rather have sex with him or with the Devil. She said, “With the Devil!” These stories don’t have happy endings, but they do show how women exercised whatever agency was possible to them.

Kate: You don’t need to be a ruler to have agency.

Robin: In some times, if a husband died, his wife would take over his trade and be admitted to the guild.

Women often died in childbirth. Think how much courage it takes to get pregnant, knowing that.

Kate: And they did often have that choice. There was withdrawal, and other methods. Family planning existed in early times in Southeast Asia.

Andrea: Also in China and Japan. People see everything pre-Meiji as dystopian. People didn’t have that many children, so we think it was because everything was horrible. It was actually very prosperous. People deliberately limited births to limit household disruption.

Kate: Women’s histories are forgotten and erased.

Robin: Is there still resistance in academia to women’s history?

Gillian: It’s acknowledged but many people don’t do more than that.

Andrea: Professors give lectures with very few revisions for decades. Doing gender studies gets you pigeonholed and less respected. Textbooks insert sidebars on women, but the narrative’s overall focus is on men.

Kate: If you write about women in fantasy, then you’re not writing about a “universal experience.”

There’s a narrative I think of as “The Hollywood Victorian Middle Ages.” George R. R. Martin writes a lot of interesting female characters in varied roles, but the gender roles aren’t actually medieval – they’re 1970s.

Gillian: The Victorian idea of separate spheres is entrenched as everyone’s idea of “the past.” Before that, roles were often not so clear-cut.

Robin: Even “medieval times” is inaccurate— What times? Where? People didn’t have separate bedrooms in earlier periods – that came later. In early Brittany, there was a war between a 12-year-old girl leader of Brittany, who inherited when her father died, and Anne, Regent of France. But there’s no book about this. It’s mentioned in passing in various sources.

Andrea: Recs Mary Gentle’s Ash series, about a medieval female mercenary captain.

Robin: The question I keep coming back to is, how can we get men to stop thinking that if we tell our own stories, that means that men always lose.

Guadalupe: My 3rd book is about a Mexican-American boy during the Mexican Revolution. It’s a male protagonist, but the women in his life are very strong. Women were completely involved in the war, with the agenda of protecting their families. I worry over how it will be received.

Kate: Why do some people desperately not want women in their stories?

Robin: Real history is seen as “revisionist” compared to fake history that people learned in school.

Guadalupe: Teachers aren’t allowed to write their own curriculums – it’s set by the state.

Gillian: I had a college student ask me, “Were people prejudiced against women back then? Why?” I blamed Aristotle.
I am attending Sirens, a conference on women in fantasy. For the benefit of anyone who wishes they were there or just is curious, I'm trying to write up some panel notes.

Cora Anderson did a presentation on Robin McKinley's use of "Beauty and the Beast," most obviously in her straight-up retellings Beauty and Rose Daughter, but also in Chalice, "Touk's House," "Buttercups," and arguably Sunshine.

She said that many similar tales, of women promised to monsters and animals, exist in many cultures, but she's primarily discussing the European versions which McKinley was drawing on. Earlier precursors include "Cupid and Psyche" and "East of the Sun, West of the Moon," in which a girl is wedded to a polar bear!

She discussed and showed slides from various versions of the original fairy-tale, depicting the Beast as everything from a ridiculous-looking sad boxer dog to a giant clothed badger to Disney and Cocteau's sexy beast. The original fairy-tail "Beauty and the Beast," by Madame Villeneuve, has a beast who was cursed to not only be ugly, but also stupid and mean. Halfway through the story, the curse breaks and he is transformed... but then the story continues, featuring a fairy war, a country of shepherds, and Beauty discovering that she was switched at birth! I am now curious to read this.

In subsequent versions, only the first part of the Villeneuve story was picked up. They tend to either have Beauty be shallow and the Beast be a decent person, so the story is about Beauty needing to change and learn to see past surface appearances, or else Beauty is great and the Beast is a jerk (or feral, or crude, etc) and the story is about him changing.

Robin McKinley doesn't take either route. Her characters are usually good people from the get-go, and her Beauty retellings (especially the first) have very little overt conflict. And yet they're enthralling (especially the first). They often have a lot of focus on mundane details, like gardening or baking. Cora said that they are not about individuals changing and learning to be better people, but about the process of falling in love and creating a relationship. Growing a garden or tending a beehive is a metaphor for that process: something new and beautiful is being made.

I suggested that stories don't necessarily need conflict, and that process - showing something being made - can be substituted. Nonfiction is often about process rather than conflict.

I also suggested that the reason Sunshine feels odd in this context is that both Con and Sunshine embody both Beauty and Beast. Con is the Beast because he's inhuman and frightening. But Sunshine is also the Beast because she think's she a monster, (in Cora's words) an unexploded thermonuclear device that could kill everyone she loves at any moment. She takes the role of the Beast dying and being healed by Beauty's love when Con saves her from dying of a poisoned wound by giving her some of his blood.

There was then some ribald discussion of the fact that while it's a joke to say, "I tripped while I was naked and fell on his dick," this literally happens in Sunshine.

Andrea Horbinsky, in a more serious context, then mentioned that Chalice is "the first honey chalice." I womanfully refrained from saying, "That's a nice euphemism!"

Cora said that McKinley really downplays the lack of consent/forced marriage, and dispenses with it altogether in several stories.

Shveta Thakrar said she'd like to see a story which explores the darker aspect of the fairy tale - the Stockholm syndrome and kidnapping - where Beauty does not get together with the Beast.

I suggested that people who wanted to tell that story typically use "Bluebeard," which is a very similar story in which the Beast really is a monster, and his wife either dies at his hand, kills him, or escapes him.

Another audience member mentioned that in Beauty, the country and castle are a place where people can be free from stifling social norms and express their true selves.

Discussion of how many readers like the Beast as a Beast, and are disappointed when he turns into a bland prince. The Beast was the one they fell in love with. Possibly apocryphal tale of Marlene Dietrich crying out at a showing of the Cocteau film, "Give me back my Beast!"
.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags