If you haven't heard of this, it's a new soy-based burger that supposedly cooks, looks, tastes, and feels exactly like a meat burger. I saw it at Fatburger, which I figured was a good place to try it -I already know I like their regular burgers so I have a good basis for comparison, and it's pretty cheap so if I hated it at least I wasn't out a tragic amount of money.
I asked the guy at the counter if people were liking it. With slight evasiveness, he said, "Yeah, lots of people are ordering it!"
If my experience was typical, I suspect that lots of people will not be ordering it twice.
On the one hand, it was by far the best non-meat burger I've ever had, and I ate almost the entire thing. (I was hungry.) However, it does not look like meat. It looks similar to meat. But it was visibly a veggie burger. I actually don't care much about appearance, but just sayin'. Similarly, the texture isn't quite right. It's close. But it has a noticeably vegetal soft homogeneity, which is different from that of ground meat. Most importantly, it doesn't taste quite like meat. Or rather, it doesn't taste like a Fatburger burger. It has a slight spiciness that I didn't care for, which is probably there to mask the non-meat flavors. If the texture and appearance had been perfect, I might have believed it as a meat burger that was overspiced to make up for the meat not being the best.
In short, disappointing. I would have preferred their real burger. I also would have preferred going home and making myself a salad. I keep hoping for a perfect meat substitute, but in the meantime I'll stick to eating less meat and mostly from identifiably good-practice sources.
Have any of you tried this? What did you think?
I asked the guy at the counter if people were liking it. With slight evasiveness, he said, "Yeah, lots of people are ordering it!"
If my experience was typical, I suspect that lots of people will not be ordering it twice.
On the one hand, it was by far the best non-meat burger I've ever had, and I ate almost the entire thing. (I was hungry.) However, it does not look like meat. It looks similar to meat. But it was visibly a veggie burger. I actually don't care much about appearance, but just sayin'. Similarly, the texture isn't quite right. It's close. But it has a noticeably vegetal soft homogeneity, which is different from that of ground meat. Most importantly, it doesn't taste quite like meat. Or rather, it doesn't taste like a Fatburger burger. It has a slight spiciness that I didn't care for, which is probably there to mask the non-meat flavors. If the texture and appearance had been perfect, I might have believed it as a meat burger that was overspiced to make up for the meat not being the best.
In short, disappointing. I would have preferred their real burger. I also would have preferred going home and making myself a salad. I keep hoping for a perfect meat substitute, but in the meantime I'll stick to eating less meat and mostly from identifiably good-practice sources.
Have any of you tried this? What did you think?
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I can understand the reason for wanting to reproduce meat, but I'd rather eat minimally processed food.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I have learned that, weirdly, I prefer Chik'n veggie nuggets to actually chicken nuggets, but that may be because I am not really enthralled by real chicken in the first place. I've never had a beef substitute that really convinced me.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I usually feel that one should let meat be meat and veggies be veggies.
We're getting most of our meat form small and local farms these days.
There have been some interesting studies recently about people's ancestries and the sort of diets that they can tolerate or thrive on.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Unlike a burger, I didn't wind up paying for it the next day, so that was also a plus.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(To be fair, I come from the grumpy place of Would Eat Anything, But Her Body Is Not Down With That. I think of those choice-based or plain choosy eaters, and wish I had the luxury they are reveling in.)
From:
no subject
If someone can create a meat substitute that's indistinguishable from real meat, that seems well worth doing and supporting for the general good.
From:
no subject
Anything you do to capture ecological productivity for your purposes kills whatever else would have used it, directly or indirectly. It doesn't matter if you're growing carrots or raising beef, something with nerves, eyes, and a spine ceased to exist for your dinner. It's possible to be bothered by the direct version more than the indirect version, but I'm generally with the pastoralists about this; there's a lot more ecological responsibility, especially in dry land (where water is the primary productivity constraint) in pastoralism and meat-eating than there is in irrigated crops or the kind of nothing-lives cropland we're increasingly seeing now. (The entire ecological guild of aerial insectivores, birds, bats, and bugs, are going extinct because there aren't enough bugs for them to eat. Not the only bad thing happening from agricultural practices.)
(My take on the "can't afford" is that wages are too low, not that sustainable farming is too expensive. Which I acknowledge is no immediate help to anyone.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
//waves from the bleacher seating of Severe Dietary Restrictions Acquired Later in Life
From:
no subject
I figure that vegetarians and vegans come up with and try meat-like substitute foods for some of the same reasons lots of people try simulations and mediated experiences and risk-mitigated versions of other, more risky or harmful experiences and so on, and some of the same reasons artists try stuff, some of which includes working towards mimesis/verismilitude.